Skip to content

Conversation

@Cosss7
Copy link
Contributor

@Cosss7 Cosss7 commented Oct 26, 2021

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 9s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 34m 12s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 23s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 compile 1m 13s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 59s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 22s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 56s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 24s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 18s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 24m 38s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 17s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javac 1m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 10s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 javac 1m 10s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 0m 51s /results-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch generated 1 new + 34 unchanged - 1 fixed = 35 total (was 35)
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 47s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 23s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 23s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 24m 15s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 330m 55s hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 47s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
435m 13s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3586/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3586
JIRA Issue HDFS-16284
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname Linux a5691e331999 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / dc09dbc
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3586/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1814 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3586/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

@tomscut tomscut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We merged HDFS-13671 and this PR into branch-3.1. And put them into our production, it looks good so far.

Performance fluctuations caused by delete large directories is basically eliminated. The processing time of FBR increased, but this is tolerable.

Copy link
Contributor

@tomscut tomscut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Cosss7, can you fix the checkstyle warn? Thanks.

@Cosss7
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cosss7 commented Dec 25, 2021

Hi @Cosss7, can you fix the checkstyle warn? Thanks.

OK, update soon.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 1s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 32m 31s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 28s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 compile 1m 21s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 0s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 29s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 3s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 32s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 16s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 22m 35s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 20s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javac 1m 20s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 13s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 javac 1m 13s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 49s hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch generated 0 new + 33 unchanged - 1 fixed = 33 total (was 34)
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 50s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 24s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 22m 10s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌ unit 413m 33s /patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 45s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
512m 43s
Reason Tests
Failed junit tests hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancerWithHANameNodes
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestSeveralNameNodes
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3586/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3586
JIRA Issue HDFS-16284
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname Linux 52968af6e0e0 4.15.0-65-generic #74-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 17 17:06:04 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / c1c7625
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3586/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 2684 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3586/2/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Nov 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants