Skip to content

Conversation

@brfrn169
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

…at restricts the pattern of the split point" to branch-2.3
@brfrn169 brfrn169 requested review from Apache9 and saintstack June 17, 2021 03:29
@brfrn169 brfrn169 self-assigned this Jun 17, 2021
@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 44s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
_ branch-2.3 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 48s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 compile 4m 10s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 37s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 49s branch-2.3 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 24s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 4m 4s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 4m 4s the patch passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 34s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 20m 13s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.10.0 or 3.1.2 3.2.1.
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 15s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 15s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
54m 22s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3395
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile
uname Linux 71ba46f70f4d 4.15.0-60-generic #67-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 22 16:55:30 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.3 / 6147c1c
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
Max. process+thread count 95 (vs. ulimit of 12500)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 19s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 7s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ branch-2.3 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 47s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 9s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 6m 33s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 43s branch-2.3 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 25s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 8s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 8s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 6m 25s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 41s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 194m 37s hbase-server in the patch passed.
223m 36s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3395
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux acc15a575958 4.15.0-136-generic #140-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 28 05:20:47 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.3 / 6147c1c
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.10+9
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 2650 (vs. ulimit of 12500)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 15s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 6s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ branch-2.3 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 55s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 57s branch-2.3 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 28s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 36s branch-2.3 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 57s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 57s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 30s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 34s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 201m 1s hbase-server in the patch passed.
225m 35s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/artifact/yetus-jdk8-hadoop2-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3395
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux dac3a9e35f54 4.15.0-128-generic #131-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 06:57:35 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision branch-2.3 / 6147c1c
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 2385 (vs. ulimit of 12500)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3395/2/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache9
Copy link
Contributor

Apache9 commented Jun 21, 2021

This is a new feature? Is it suitable to be backported to 2.3?

@ndimiduk

@brfrn169
Copy link
Member Author

This may be a new feature but it doesn't break any compatibilities. So I thought we could put it into the next 2.3.x release. What do you guys think? Thanks.

@brfrn169 brfrn169 requested a review from ndimiduk June 22, 2021 00:30
@ndimiduk
Copy link
Member

I personally think this cannot be applied to any patch release. It introduces a new table configuration, which may cause problems during a rollback. What are the "Server-Server" compatibility implications of this change being applied to any patch release?

http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning.post10

Copy link
Member

@ndimiduk ndimiduk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I request two small javadoc changes if this does go back to a 2.3.x.

* ensures that all rows starting with the same userid, belongs to the same region.
* @see KeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy
*
* @deprecated since 2.4.3 and will be removed in 4.0.0. Use {@link RegionSplitRestriction},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to update this deprecation string to also include the applicable 2.3.x version number.

* This ensures that a region is not split "inside" a prefix of a row key.
* I.e. rows can be co-located in a region by their prefix.
*
* @deprecated since 2.4.3 and will be removed in 4.0.0. Use {@link RegionSplitRestriction},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to update this deprecation string to also include the applicable 2.3.x version number.

@brfrn169
Copy link
Member Author

@ndimiduk Thank you for taking a look at this!

What are the "Server-Server" compatibility implications of this change being applied to any patch release?

I don't think it breaks the "Server-Server" compatibility, and we can perform a rolling upgrade to the version that has this fix. But yes, it's not a bug fix, but introducing a new table configuration, so we shouldn't apply it to patch releases. So I will close this PR. Thanks.

@brfrn169 brfrn169 closed this Jun 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants