[DRAFT] HIVE-29799: Table containing flattened union files cannot be converted to ACID - #6678
Closed
abstractdog wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
[DRAFT] HIVE-29799: Table containing flattened union files cannot be converted to ACID#6678abstractdog wants to merge 2 commits into
abstractdog wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…subdirs after ACID conversion
abstractdog
marked this pull request as draft
August 5, 2026 13:26
|
Contributor
Author
|
I'll merge this change together with #6675 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is a draft until HIVE-29798 is not resolved, in the meantime, a patch for HIVE-29798 is included
I don't want to squash them as they fix separate issues, and HIVE-29798 introduces a unit test revealing this problem also
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?