You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Four places still instruct an agent to write a commit trailer naming a specific vendor and model
version. PR #734 fixed this for the spec-loop prompts; apply the same fix to the four it did not
touch, three of which are skills.
Background
The Generated-by: trailer should name the agent and model that actually produced the commit.
PR #734 changed the spec-loop prompts from a frozen Generated-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) to Generated-by: <agent> (<model>), with an instruction to fill in the real values and two
worked examples (Claude (Opus 4.8), OpenCode (Big Pickle)).
The same reasoning applies to four other locations that were missed. Three are skills, which
matters more than the loop prompts: adopters run skills, so a hardcoded vendor name lands in
other projects' commit history. PRINCIPLE 9 says vendor neutrality is non-negotiable.
Still hardcoded:
skills/setup-override-upstream/SKILL.md:261 — Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.7)
skills/setup-shared-config-sync/SKILL.md:173 and :324 — Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus <version>) (the version is a placeholder, but the vendor and
product are not)
skills/security-issue-fix/SKILL.md:659 — Generated-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)
tools/skill-evals/evals/setup-shared-config-sync/step-5-draft-commit/fixtures/output-spec.md:20
— the eval expectsClaude Code (Opus <version>), so a correctly self-identifying non-Claude
agent would fail this eval
That last one is the sharpest: after #734, the framework instructs one thing and tests for
another.
Not in scope: eval fixture files under evals/*/fixtures/*/report.md that contain a Generated-by: Claude … line. Those are simulated inbound commits — test data, where a real
tool name is realistic and correct. Leave them alone.
This issue was drafted with the help of an AI-assisted tool and reviewed by a Magpie maintainer before posting. If anything here is unclear or looks wrong, say so on the issue: a real person is reading.
Summary
Four places still instruct an agent to write a commit trailer naming a specific vendor and model
version. PR #734 fixed this for the spec-loop prompts; apply the same fix to the four it did not
touch, three of which are skills.
Background
The
Generated-by:trailer should name the agent and model that actually produced the commit.PR #734 changed the spec-loop prompts from a frozen
Generated-by: Claude (Opus 4.7)toGenerated-by: <agent> (<model>), with an instruction to fill in the real values and twoworked examples (
Claude (Opus 4.8),OpenCode (Big Pickle)).The same reasoning applies to four other locations that were missed. Three are skills, which
matters more than the loop prompts: adopters run skills, so a hardcoded vendor name lands in
other projects' commit history. PRINCIPLE 9 says vendor neutrality is non-negotiable.
Still hardcoded:
skills/setup-override-upstream/SKILL.md:261—Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.7)skills/setup-shared-config-sync/SKILL.md:173and:324—Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus <version>)(the version is a placeholder, but the vendor andproduct are not)
skills/security-issue-fix/SKILL.md:659—Generated-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)tools/skill-evals/evals/setup-shared-config-sync/step-5-draft-commit/fixtures/output-spec.md:20— the eval expects
Claude Code (Opus <version>), so a correctly self-identifying non-Claudeagent would fail this eval
That last one is the sharpest: after #734, the framework instructs one thing and tests for
another.
Not in scope: eval fixture files under
evals/*/fixtures/*/report.mdthat contain aGenerated-by: Claude …line. Those are simulated inbound commits — test data, where a realtool name is realistic and correct. Leave them alone.
Where to look
tools/spec-loop/PROMPT_build.md— the wording PR docs(spec-loop): derive commit trailer from the running agent and model #734 landed; copy its shape, including thetwo examples and the "do not hardcode either" instruction.
AGENTS.md§ Commit and PR conventions — the authoritative rule for the trailer, and theCo-Authored-Byprohibition that must survive any rewording.Acceptance criteria
<agent> (<model>)form with an instruction to fill in thereal values.
Co-Authored-Byprohibition adjacent to an edited line is preserved.report.mdfixture is changed.prek run --all-filespasses.Estimated effort
~1 hour for someone new to the codebase.
Getting started
[How to contribute](https://github.com/apache/airflow-steward/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#your-first-contribution)
This issue was drafted with the help of an AI-assisted tool and reviewed by a Magpie maintainer before posting. If anything here is unclear or looks wrong, say so on the issue: a real person is reading.