Improve error reporting

[kwin]

Add unit tests to check error reporting

Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:

• Your pull request should address just one issue, without pulling in other changes.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
  Note that commits might be squashed by a maintainer on merge.
• Write unit tests that match behavioral changes, where the tests fail if the changes to the runtime are not applied.
  This may not always be possible but is a best-practice.
• Run mvn verify to make sure basic checks pass.
  A more thorough check will be performed on your pull request automatically.
• You have run the integration tests successfully (mvn -Prun-its verify).

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.

• I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
• In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

[gnodet]

Nice work on the error-reporting improvements, @kwin — the continue-on-error pattern with precise DocTreePath locations is a big UX improvement for developers debugging their javadoc tags. The DocTreePathAwareRuntimeException is a clean solution, and I especially like that you fixed the pre-existing bug where extractClassLink hardcoded "@configurationDefaultValue" in error messages even when called for the @configurationType tag.

One thing caught my attention:

Behavioral regression: fields without @configurationDefaultValue are now silently dropped

In processResolverField, the new null guard:

String defValue = resolveDefaultValue(type, field, docComment, blockTags.get("configurationDefaultValue"));
if (defValue == null) {
    // Error was already reported, skip this field
    return;
}

changes behavior for fields that have @configurationSource but no @configurationDefaultValue tag. On master, resolveDefaultValue returned null for a missing tag, but the field was still included via nvl(defValue, "") producing an empty default value string. After this PR, the field is silently skipped.

This affects real configuration keys in the codebase — a quick check shows at least:

File	@configurationSource	@configurationDefaultValue
ClasspathTransporterFactory.java	1	0
DefaultOfflineController.java	3	0
GnupgConfigurationKeys.java	5	4

The comment "Error was already reported" is also not accurate — when contentTag is null (tag absent), resolveDefaultValue returns null silently without reporting anything.

Suggested fix: remove the if (defValue == null) return; guard and keep the original nvl(defValue, "") handling when building the entry. The null return from resolveDefaultValue for a missing tag is a valid "no default" case, not an error. The actual error case (unresolvable link) already throws DocTreePathAwareRuntimeException and is caught by the per-field catch blocks.

Minor nits:

• There's a stray blank line in extractClassLink between the if condition and the throw statement
• The top-level run() catch lost the stack trace (e.printStackTrace(reporter.getStandardWriter()) was removed) — for truly unexpected failures (NPEs, etc.), the stack trace is valuable for diagnosis

This review was generated by an AI agent and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify all suggestions before applying.

[cstamas]

And as can be seen on 2.0.21 release: https://maven.apache.org/resolver-archives/resolver-LATEST/configuration.html

Not all "Source" (last column) values are handled, there are some uninterpolated values left.

Unsure is this help or renderer issue, but it should be replaced with "Java System Properties", as currently Resolver config is sourced from two places:

• session config properties (main source)
• Java system properties (early ones, usually during object graph construction, when there is no session yet)

[gnodet]

Thanks for the follow-up commit, @kwin — the "Don't skip field without default values" fix directly addresses the behavioral regression I flagged in my review.

Verified: processResolverField no longer has the early return on null defValue, and instead flows through nvl(defValue, "") — matching the master branch behavior. Fields like ClasspathTransporterFactory.CONFIG_PROP_CLASSPATH_MANAGER, DefaultOfflineController's three keys, and GnupgConfigurationKeys.GPGCONF_* will now be correctly included in the generated properties with empty default values, as before.

The rest of the changes (continue-on-error pattern with DocTreePathAwareRuntimeException, precise DocTreePath locations, updated tests) look solid. CI is running on the new commit — will check back when it completes.

This comment was generated by an AI agent and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify all suggestions before applying.

[gnodet]

Solid error-reporting improvement. The continue-on-error pattern with precise DocTreePath locations is a well-designed improvement over the fail-fast approach. Good test coverage with CapturingDiagnosticsListener.

The second commit correctly fixed the behavioral regression where fields without @configurationDefaultValue were being silently dropped. CI passes across all matrix combinations.

Minor observations (not blockers):

• The generic RuntimeException catch block (line 169) constructs a DocTreePath with docComment, but docComment can be null when processing maven-mode fields — a guard would prevent masking the real error with an NPE.
• The run() catch block no longer prints stack traces for unexpected failures — worth preserving for diagnostic value.
• Stray blank line in extractClassLink (line 480) and minor javadoc typo in the test ("the a fixture" → "a fixture").

This review was generated by an AI agent and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify all suggestions before applying.

Claude Code on behalf of gnodet