GH-3710: Tolerate unrecognized logical/physical type combinations when reading - #3711
Open
divjotarora wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
GH-3710: Tolerate unrecognized logical/physical type combinations when reading#3711divjotarora wants to merge 1 commit into
divjotarora wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
divjotarora
force-pushed
the
log-phys-type-combo
branch
from
August 6, 2026 15:13
57ea343 to
8469645
Compare
divjotarora
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 6, 2026 15:13
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
See apache/parquet-format#607 for rationale.
What changes are included in this PR?
This PR modifies parquet-java to gracefully handle unrecognized logical/physical type combinations by dropping the logical type during the read and dropping any associated statistics for the relevant columns. Note that unrecognized logical types are already handled gracefully and no changes were required.
Are these changes tested?
Yes, several unit tests added.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
Closes #3710