Skip to content

[CI] Bump proj4sedona to 0.1.6 - #3215

Merged
jiayuasu merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
jiayuasu:deps/proj4sedona-0.1.6
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

[CI] Bump proj4sedona to 0.1.6#3215
jiayuasu merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
jiayuasu:deps/proj4sedona-0.1.6

Conversation

@jiayuasu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Did you read the Contributor Guide?

Is this PR related to a ticket?

  • No. This is a dependency-only update.

What changes were proposed in this PR?

Bump org.datasyslab:proj4sedona from 0.1.5 to 0.1.6.

The new release includes the remote CRS resolver reliability improvements from proj4sedona#131, including a jsDelivr primary endpoint, raw GitHub fallback, bounded retries, and local CRS definition caching.

How was this patch tested?

  • Verified org.datasyslab:proj4sedona:0.1.6 resolves from Maven Central.
  • mvn -pl common -Dtest=FunctionsProj4Test test
    • 43 tests passed.
  • mvn -pl spark/common -am -DskipTests -Dspark=3.5 -Dscala=2.12 install
    • Reactor build passed.
  • mvn -pl spark/common -Dspark=3.5 -Dscala=2.12 -Dsuites=org.apache.sedona.sql.CRSTransformProj4Test scalatest:test
    • 37 tests passed.
  • A separate Spark SQL validation resolved non-built-in EPSG:2154 through the default remote provider and confirmed that 10,000 subsequent transforms reused the cached CRS definition.

Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?

  • No, this PR does not affect any public API, so no documentation change is needed.

@jiayuasu
jiayuasu marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2026 03:28
@jiayuasu jiayuasu changed the title Bump proj4sedona to 0.1.6 [CI] Bump proj4sedona to 0.1.6 Jul 30, 2026
@jiayuasu jiayuasu added this to the sedona-1.9.1 milestone Jul 30, 2026
@jiayuasu
jiayuasu merged commit 3e8c870 into apache:master Jul 30, 2026
43 checks passed
jiayuasu added a commit to jiayuasu/sedona that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2026
Picks up the proj4sedona 0.1.6 bump (apache#3215), which fixes the CRS metadata
failures in geoparquetIOTests seen on this PR's CI run.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant