Skip to content

[SPARK-36097][CORE] Grouping exception in core/scheduler#33529

Closed
dgd-contributor wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
dgd-contributor:SPARK-36097
Closed

[SPARK-36097][CORE] Grouping exception in core/scheduler#33529
dgd-contributor wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
dgd-contributor:SPARK-36097

Conversation

@dgd-contributor
Copy link

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR group exception messages in core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler

Why are the changes needed?

It will largely help with standardization of error messages and its maintenance.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No. Error messages remain unchanged.

How was this patch tested?

No new tests - pass all original tests to make sure it doesn't break any existing behavior.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the CORE label Jul 27, 2021
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@dgd-contributor dgd-contributor changed the title [Spark-36097][CORE] Grouping exception in core/scheduler [SPARK-36097][CORE] Grouping exception in core/scheduler Jul 28, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@allisonwang-db allisonwang-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a few comments. Please also resolve the merge conflict.

@dgd-contributor
Copy link
Author

@allisonwang-db I've rebase and resolve all of your suggestions. Can you re-review.

Copy link
Contributor

@allisonwang-db allisonwang-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@dgd-contributor
Copy link
Author

cc @cloud-fan

@mridulm
Copy link
Contributor

mridulm commented Jul 30, 2021

@cloud-fan There are a few of these PR's, wanted to surface this comment - to make sure are interfaces are tighter.

I dont want to post this in all PR's :-)

@dgd-contributor
Copy link
Author

@cloud-fan There are a few of these PR's, wanted to surface this comment - to make sure are interfaces are tighter.

I dont want to post this in all PR's :-)

cc @allisonwang-db as well

@dgd-contributor
Copy link
Author

cc @cloud-fan I've resolve the conflict file, can you review this

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merging to master!

@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in 9b96b70 Aug 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants