[SPARK-57794][BUILD] Remove hadoop-huaweicloud and its okhttp/okio dependencies

[zhangxinyao88]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Remove the direct hadoop-huaweicloud dependency from hadoop-cloud, together with its
explicit OkHttp and Okio dependencies, version properties, dependency scope property, and
huaweicloud-provided profile.

Keep the hadoop-huaweicloud exclusion on hadoop-cloud-storage so that the connector is not
reintroduced transitively. Update LICENSE-binary and the Hadoop 3 dependency manifest to
remove the three JARs.

Closes #57794.

Why are the changes needed?

Spark has no source code, tests, or documentation that use the Huawei OBS connector. Bundling
it pulls in the obsolete OkHttp 3.12.12 and Okio 1.17.6 dependency tree, including an OkHttp
version affected by CVE-2021-0341. Removing the unused connector eliminates that dependency
tree without changing Spark's supported default paths.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes. Spark distributions built with the Hadoop cloud module no longer bundle
hadoop-huaweicloud, OkHttp 3.12.12, or Okio 1.17.6. Spark APIs and documented/default cloud
storage paths are unchanged.

How was this patch tested?

No unit tests were added because this patch only removes Maven and binary-distribution metadata.
It was validated with:

./build/mvn -Phadoop-3,hadoop-cloud -pl hadoop-cloud help:effective-pom \
  -Doutput=/private/tmp/spark-hadoop-cloud-effective-pom.xml
./build/mvn -Phadoop-3,hadoop-cloud,hadoop-provided -pl hadoop-cloud help:effective-pom \
  -Doutput=/private/tmp/spark-hadoop-cloud-provided-effective-pom.xml -q
xmllint --noout pom.xml hadoop-cloud/pom.xml
LC_ALL=C sort -c dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-3-hive-2.3
git diff --check upstream/master

Both effective POMs contain zero direct hadoop-huaweicloud, okhttp, or okio
dependencies, retain exactly one hadoop-huaweicloud exclusion, and contain no
huaweicloud-provided profile or huaweicloud.deps.scope property.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

Generated-by: OpenAI Codex (codex-cli 0.146.0)

[zhangxinyao88]

Hi @anupamme — thanks for the work on #57779. I only found it after opening this PR. Full CI is green here, including the extra dependency-manifest and license cleanup I mentioned in the coordination thread.

I wanted to loop you in first before involving other reviewers. Happy to follow whichever direction you think makes the most sense.

[anupamme]

Responded to PR #57779

[uros-b]

Thank you @zhangxinyao88 and @anupamme for coordinating. Shall we close the current PR at this point?

[uros-b]

cc #57779 (review)