Skip to content

Optimized Python accepts ambiguous operator definitions #8207

Description

@carloea2

Feature Summary

Executor loading validates that user code defines exactly one operator with an assert. Optimized Python removes that validation, so code with multiple operators silently selects the first definition and can run unintended logic.

Before: multiple operator definitions -> first operator is silently selected

After: multiple operator definitions -> ValueError rejects ambiguous code

Reproduction evidence:

  1. Run the Python worker with optimization enabled.
  2. Load user code defining two concrete operators.
  3. Observe that the first operator is returned without an error.

A direct run on main produced:

optimized= True
selected_definition= FirstOperator
error_raised= False

Version and commit evidence:

1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT (main)

Commit Hash

70c2114

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

Not browser-specific.

Relevant log output

None.

Proposed Solution or Design

After: multiple operator definitions -> ValueError rejects ambiguous code

Affected Area

Workflow Engine (Amber)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions