Skip to content

[Improvement] Add dynamic allocation patch for Spark 3.3 - #1224

Merged
roryqi merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
summaryzb:support_dynamic_allocation3.3
Oct 7, 2023
Merged

[Improvement] Add dynamic allocation patch for Spark 3.3#1224
roryqi merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
summaryzb:support_dynamic_allocation3.3

Conversation

@summaryzb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add the dynamic allocation patch for Spark 3.3

Why are the changes needed?

#1084

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Manual test

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1224 (63f2467) into master (caf7104) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1224   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     54.90%   54.90%           
  Complexity     2606     2606           
=========================================
  Files           372      372           
  Lines         20147    20147           
  Branches       1889     1889           
=========================================
  Hits          11061    11061           
  Misses         8448     8448           
  Partials        638      638           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@summaryzb
summaryzb force-pushed the support_dynamic_allocation3.3 branch from e6d0b32 to 63f2467 Compare October 5, 2023 16:05

@roryqi roryqi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @summaryzb

@roryqi
roryqi merged commit 81844b0 into apache:master Oct 7, 2023
@summaryzb
summaryzb deleted the support_dynamic_allocation3.3 branch March 14, 2025 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants