Fix minor issues with CLI #115
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new JSON metadata file for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/indexers.ts (1)
13-13: Consider documenting the hashing strategyThe implementation correctly maintains the mapping between original indexer names and their hashed versions. Consider adding a comment explaining this strategy for future maintainers.
Add a comment above the indexers array:
${indexers.map((i) => `import _${hash(i)} from '${i.indexer}';`).join("\n")} + // Map original indexer names to their hashed versions to support special characters + // while maintaining valid JavaScript identifiers export const indexers = [ ${indexers.map((i) => `{ name: "${i.name}", indexer: _${hash(i)} }`).join(",\n")}packages/cli/build.config.ts (1)
46-47: Consider improving maintainability with constants and documentation.The implementation could benefit from these minor improvements:
+ // CLI output file name + const CLI_OUTPUT_FILE = "cli/index.mjs"; + // Add shebang to make the CLI executable through npm rollup: { output: { banner: ({ fileName }) => - fileName === "cli/index.mjs" ? "#!/usr/bin/env node" : undefined, + fileName === CLI_OUTPUT_FILE ? "#!/usr/bin/env node" : undefined, }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
change/apibara-f4d98eff-8f08-4f04-bf68-8ac249c3c0e7.json(1 hunks)packages/cli/build.config.ts(1 hunks)packages/cli/package.json(1 hunks)packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/indexers.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- change/apibara-f4d98eff-8f08-4f04-bf68-8ac249c3c0e7.json
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/indexers.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Good choice of hashing library
The addition of ohash is appropriate for generating consistent hashes for indexer names.
10-10: Verify hash consistency across builds
The implementation correctly handles special characters in indexer names by using hashed identifiers. The _ prefix ensures valid JavaScript identifiers.
Let's verify the hash consistency and potential collisions:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the hash implementation to verify its consistency. I'll need to check the hash function and its usage.
Hash implementation is reliable and consistent
The implementation uses the ohash package, which is a well-tested and reliable hashing library. The hash function is deterministic, meaning it will produce the same output for the same input across different builds. The _ prefix ensures valid JavaScript identifiers, and using ohash guarantees consistent hash generation with minimal collision probability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential hash collisions in indexer names
# Look for files that might contain indexer definitions to test hash consistency
# Search for indexer definitions
rg -l "indexer[\"']?\s*[:=]" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking $file for indexer definitions ==="
rg "indexer[\"']?\s*[:=]" "$file" -A 2
done
Length of output: 9822
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the hash function implementation and its usage
rg -l "function hash" packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/indexers.ts
echo "=== Hash function implementation ==="
rg "function hash" -A 5 packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/indexers.ts
# Check if the hash function is imported from another module
echo "=== Hash imports ==="
rg "import.*hash" packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/indexers.ts
Length of output: 446
Line range hint 5-17: Verify error handling for edge cases
While the implementation is solid, we should ensure proper error handling for edge cases.
Let's check for existing error handling patterns:
✅ Verification successful
No additional error handling needed for indexers plugin
Based on the codebase analysis, the current implementation is appropriate and doesn't require additional error handling for edge cases because:
- Input validation is handled at the type level through the
Apibarainterface which ensuresindexersis an array ofIndexerDefinitionobjects. - The plugin uses
Setto deduplicate indexers, preventing any duplicate processing. - The
hashfunction fromohashis a reliable hashing implementation that safely handles various input types. - The virtual plugin is used in a straightforward way with string template literals, which is safe for the given input types.
- The indexers array is already validated and processed by the CLI's core scanning logic in
packages/cli/src/core/scan.tsbefore reaching this plugin.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for error handling patterns in similar plugin files
# Look for error handling patterns in rollup plugins
echo "=== Checking error handling patterns in rollup plugins ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "throw|catch|Error" "packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/"
# Look for validation patterns
echo "=== Checking validation patterns ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "validate|check|assert" "packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/"
Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to analyze the codebase for error handling patterns
# First, let's see what other files exist in the plugins directory
echo "=== Listing files in plugins directory ==="
fd . "packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/"
# Let's examine the content of these plugin files
echo "=== Examining plugin implementations ==="
fd . "packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/" -t f -x cat
# Let's also check if there are any type definitions or interfaces that might enforce validation
echo "=== Checking for type definitions ==="
rg -t ts "interface|type" "packages/cli/src/rollup/plugins/"
Length of output: 3568
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Apibara type definition to understand the input validation
echo "=== Checking Apibara type definition ==="
rg -t ts "interface.*Apibara|type.*Apibara" -A 10
# Let's also check if there's any validation in the main CLI code that calls this plugin
echo "=== Checking CLI validation ==="
fd . "packages/cli/src/" -t f -x rg -l "indexers.*plugin|apibara.*indexers"
Length of output: 20851
packages/cli/build.config.ts (1)
44-49: LGTM! The shebang implementation looks correct.
The rollup configuration correctly adds the shebang to the CLI module, which will enable proper execution through npm.
packages/cli/package.json (2)
102-102: LGTM! Addition of ohash dependency.
The addition of ohash aligns with the PR objective to hash indexer filenames for better handling of special characters.
102-102: Verify ohash version and security.
Let's verify the latest stable version and check for any security advisories for ohash.
✅ Verification successful
ohash version 1.1.4 is up-to-date and secure
The package is using the latest stable version (1.1.4) and no security issues were found:
- Latest version on npm registry matches the version in package.json
- No open security-labeled issues in the GitHub repository
- Package is actively maintained with recent releases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version and security advisories for ohash
# Check NPM for latest versions
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/ohash | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest'
# Check for known vulnerabilities
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/ohash | jq '.versions | keys[] as $k | select($k | contains("1.1.4")) | . as $version | $version' && \
npm audit --json ohash@1.1.4 2>/dev/null || echo "Package not found in npm audit"
# Check GitHub issues for security-related concerns
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "unjs", name: "ohash") {
issues(first: 5, labels: ["security"], states: OPEN) {
nodes {
title
url
createdAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 40185
2 participants
Fix a couple of small issues I have found while working on the tutorial.