fix: Refactoring bindings logic for module instances to fix the naming issue#30574
fix: Refactoring bindings logic for module instances to fix the naming issue#30574ankitakinger merged 2 commits intoreleasefrom
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates include adding a new selector function, Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" |
|
Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀 |
|
Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7636439898. |
|
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7636439898.
|
…o fix/bindings-for-module-instances
|
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All" |
|
Whoa, @tag.All spotted in your test suite! 🚀 |
|
Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7636972943. |
|
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7636972943.
|
|
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/7636972943. |
Description
Refactoring bindings logic for module instances to fix the naming issue
PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes #30575
Type of change
Testing
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist:
Dev activity
QA activity:
Test Plan Approvedlabel after Cypress tests were reviewedTest Plan Approvedlabel after JUnit tests were reviewedSummary by CodeRabbit
EntityPropertiescomponent for improved performance and reliability.