Skip to content

Fix api settings page not getting updated#3489

Merged
hetunandu merged 2 commits into
releasefrom
fix/api-setting-page-select
Mar 11, 2021
Merged

Fix api settings page not getting updated#3489
hetunandu merged 2 commits into
releasefrom
fix/api-setting-page-select

Conversation

@ram-primathon

@ram-primathon ram-primathon commented Mar 11, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

fix API settings page is not getting updated

Fixes #3191

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@ram-primathon
ram-primathon requested a review from hetunandu March 11, 2021 06:04
Comment thread app/client/src/components/ads/Checkbox.tsx Outdated
@hetunandu hetunandu changed the title fix #3191 Fix api settings page not getting updated Mar 11, 2021
@ram-primathon
ram-primathon requested a review from hetunandu March 11, 2021 07:36
@hetunandu
hetunandu merged commit 5b2832f into release Mar 11, 2021
@hetunandu
hetunandu deleted the fix/api-setting-page-select branch March 11, 2021 12:03
sondermanish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
…_SUGGESTIONS (#3489)

## Description
Attaching `fetchInviteGroupsSuggestionsSaga` function with
`FETCH_GROUP_SUGGESTIONS` redux event which got removed after the
merging of PR : https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/3416 on
the line number :
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/commit/f9406e56829aee826b4d83c2744e23f14886d9a8#diff-36d62a98cb49c981f18d69a326cc54fbda0c8a0aad1106083f8d183990f508b2L115

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes [#30936](#30936)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
sondermanish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
…_SUGGESTIONS (#3489)

## Description
Attaching `fetchInviteGroupsSuggestionsSaga` function with
`FETCH_GROUP_SUGGESTIONS` redux event which got removed after the
merging of PR : https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/3416 on
the line number :
https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/commit/f9406e56829aee826b4d83c2744e23f14886d9a8#diff-36d62a98cb49c981f18d69a326cc54fbda0c8a0aad1106083f8d183990f508b2L115

#### PR fixes following issue(s)
Fixes [#30936](#30936)
> if no issue exists, please create an issue and ask the maintainers
about this first
>
>
#### Media
> A video or a GIF is preferred. when using Loom, don’t embed because it
looks like it’s a GIF. instead, just link to the video
>
>
#### Type of change
> Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to not work as expected)
- Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
- This change requires a documentation update
>
>
>
## Testing
>
#### How Has This Been Tested?
> Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also
list any relevant details for your test configuration.
> Delete anything that is not relevant
- [ ] Manual
- [ ] JUnit
- [ ] Jest
- [ ] Cypress
>
>
#### Test Plan
> Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR
>
>
#### Issues raised during DP testing
> Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking
(copy link from comments dropped on this PR)
>
>
>
## Checklist:
#### Dev activity
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] PR is being merged under a feature flag


#### QA activity:
- [ ] [Speedbreak
features](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#speedbreakers-)
have been covered
- [ ] Test plan covers all impacted features and [areas of
interest](https://github.com/appsmithorg/TestSmith/wiki/Guidelines-for-test-plans#areas-of-interest-)
- [ ] Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other
QA members
- [ ] Manually tested functionality on DP
- [ ] We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA
Round 2
- [ ] Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after Cypress tests were reviewed
- [ ] Added `Test Plan Approved` label after JUnit tests were reviewed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] API settings page is not getting updated on selecting a different API

2 participants