Complete coverage for #66

[greebie]

The title of this pull-request should be a brief description of what the pull-request fixes/improves/changes. Ideally 50 characters or less.

---

GitHub issue(s):

If you are responding to an issue, please mention their numbers below.

#66

What does this Pull Request do?

A brief description of what the intended result of the Pull Request (PR) will be, what problem it solves, technical details, and any possible side effects.

Improve coverage for JsonUtils.

How should this be tested?

Codcov and Travis.

Additional Notes:

Any additional information that you think would be helpful when reviewing this PR.

Example:

• Does this change require documentation to be updated?
• Does this change add any new dependencies?
• Could this change or impact execution of existing code?

Interested parties

Tag (@ mention) interested parties.

Thanks in advance for your help with the Archives Unleashed Toolkit!

[greebie]

I'm hoping this triggers the Map-based .toJson() function and covers 100%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #88 into master will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #88      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.47%   48.59%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines         821      821              
  Branches      147      147              
==========================================
+ Hits          398      399       +1     
+ Misses        382      381       -1     
  Partials       41       41

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...la/io/archivesunleashed/spark/utils/JsonUtil.scala	100% <0%> (+14.28%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c8b7d2e...70613e0. Read the comment docs.

[ianmilligan1]

Looks good to me – go codecov go!