Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Member
Author
|
Oh, I should update the readme :) |
davidmytton
approved these changes
May 16, 2025
Contributor
davidmytton
left a comment
davidmytton
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice one. I love seeing dependencies removed 😎
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #252
My goal here was visual parity, not good css. Duplication and odd class names to be expected. This will just be a starting point and I expect to replace or clean up most of these styles over the coming days (or migrate to our design system).
Steps taken, after each step playwright was used to sanity check:
I'm sure I missed something along the way, I'll be doing more visual comparisons before I merge