NGSOK-1401 Backport SPARK-48392 (--load-spark-defaults) into spark 3.5.4#25
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <giggsoff@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <giggsoff@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <giggsoff@gmail.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
We also need to verify that #2 works as expected. |
Asmoday
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2026
Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <giggsoff@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backport SPARK-48392 (
--load-spark-defaults) into spark 3.5.4.Why are the changes needed?
To allow store user-provided options in file and merge them with defaults.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Adds
--load-spark-defaultsoption.How was this patch tested?
Using unit tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.