Part of the Automators+ skills library -- Claude Code skills shared exclusively with the Automators+ community.
Stop Claude from being a yes man.
Ask Claude "should I launch this?" and it finds five reasons you should. Ask "is this a bad idea?" and it finds five reasons it is. A Stanford study found AI assistants agree with your decisions about 49% more often than a human would. This skill fixes that by running any decision through five advisors who argue, grade each other anonymously, and hand you one verdict you can trust.
- A drop-in Claude Code skill at
.claude/skills/llm-council/SKILL.md - Five advisors with different jobs (Contrarian, First-Principles, Expansionist, Outsider, Executor) who answer independently
- Anonymous peer review so the model grades honestly instead of defending itself
- A chairman that commits to one verdict under 250 words: the call, the strongest reason, the biggest risk, the next step in 7 days
- No API keys, no MCP servers, no scripts -- runs entirely with Claude Code subagents
claude skill add --url https://raw.githubusercontent.com/automatorsplus/llm-council-skill/main/.claude/skills/llm-council/SKILL.md
Copy .claude/skills/llm-council/ into your project's .claude/skills/ folder.
None. Any recent version of Claude Code that can spawn subagents will run it.
Once installed, try one of these in Claude Code:
council this: should I drop my free tier and go paid-only?pressure-test this: I want to raise my retainer from $2.5k to $4k a monthrun the council on whether I should hire a developer now or in three monthswar room this: my new landing page headline -- "AI that runs your back office"
Best for ambiguous, high-stakes calls (pricing, positioning, hiring, pivots, copy). Skip it for factual questions, drafting, or summarising.
See .claude/skills/llm-council/SKILL.md for the full skill definition.
Built on Andrej Karpathy's LLM Council idea, adapted to run inside a single Claude Code session with subagents instead of multiple model providers.
MIT
Shared with the Automators+ community