-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
Fix suggestion, needs discussion #415
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5f33f52
Fix suggestion, needs discussion
thijssnelleman 868167a
Turning loop into one liner
thijssnelleman 3b66520
removing prints
thijssnelleman 6aa45ce
mistake in the logic
thijssnelleman cd36d90
Add vampire.pcs, parametrize tests with name of pcs file
mfeurer 3400af6
Adding note
thijssnelleman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| age_weight_ratio:log_ratio real [-10.0, 3.0] [0.0] | ||
| saturation_algorithm categorical {discount, fmb, inst_gen, lrs, otter, z3} [lrs] | ||
| inst_gen_with_resolution categorical {off, on} [off] | ||
|
|
||
| age_weight_ratio:log_ratio | saturation_algorithm != inst_gen || inst_gen_with_resolution == on | ||
| inst_gen_with_resolution | saturation_algorithm == inst_gen |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could be less aggressive with the deletion and keep the
else:branch, i.e. when it's not aConjunction. Otherwise, I guess the fix is to see what kind of conjunction it is to know whether to use.any() [AND]or.all() [OR].That being said, I don't know if this code is needed here in the first place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But the else branch no longer serves a purpose due to the if statement of 522 disappearing (condition.statisfied_by_vector is not using it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Turned it into a one liner for readability