Skip to content

7. Results

E Burg edited this page Jan 18, 2023 · 1 revision

Please note that the following results are when compared with images of different classes used in training of the model; for a real- life accuracy statistics, the model must be compared with non-vector carrier images as well as vector-carrier images to compute the accuracy. Each epoch took approximately 5 hrs to run on 16 GB RAM with a 2.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 processor. Please note that the loss function did not reduce exponentially as typically expected due to fine-tuning of the learning rate resulting in abnormal variables.

Epoch Loss Accuracy Notes
0 52 0 1 epoch equates to > 5 hrs of learning
1 24 0.1113 learning rate 0.01
2 16 0.1113  
3 16 0.1113  
4 26.15 0.1113 Irregular data due to high learning rate (eventually regularized)
5 26.95 0.1113  
6 27.05 0.1113  
7 14.71 0.1113  
8 7.8 0.1113  
9 8.7 0.1113  
10 5.95 0.1113  
11 6.7953 0.1113  
12 6.7195 0.1113  
13 10.4273 0.1113  
14 7.5758 0.1113  
15 10.4273 0.1113 Reduced the learning rate from 0.01 to 0.0005 for stabilised learning
16 1.3632 0.5049 reduced learning rate to 0.0001 and began shuffling images (error in code resulted in only training one batch) - finally accuracy is beginning to improve
17 1.0958 0.6061 learning rate increased to 0.001
18 0.8411 0.697  
19 0.7158 0.7672 Loss and accuracy appear to have stabilised
20 0.2745 0.9073  
21 0.2111 0.9258 Again accuracy is plateauing- reduced learning rate to 0.00005
22 0.9659 0.8913  
23 0.1059 0.9678 Finally reached industrial level precision (>95%)  after approximately 120 hrs of training

 

Clone this wiki locally