v0.1.0

First public release.

• 24-rule catalog across four categories: rhetorical-tic, puffery, structure,
  hedging. See sloplint rules or README.md for the full list.
• check, rules, explain, version commands; JSON and human-readable
  output; --select/--ignore by rule id or category; --markdown to skip
  fenced code, inline code, and URLs before scanning.
• Exit codes: 0 clean, 1 notes found, 2 bad arguments or invalid input
  (including invalid UTF-8 and unknown --select/--ignore ids).
• Zero runtime dependencies; requires Ruby >= 3.3.
• -v/--version print the version and exit 0. optparse auto-registers its
  own --version switch on any parser that doesn't define one, and that
  default printed "version unknown" to the real stdout and hard-exited,
  bypassing the out:/return-a-code contract every other path honors --
  caught by hand-testing the freshly built gem before this release shipped.
• Rationale text (sloplint explain) across six rules no longer narrates the
  rule's own implementation -- pattern scoping, anchoring, tuning history,
  corpus-driven thresholds. It states why the construct reads as AI writing
  and nothing else.

Rules narrowed against a corpus of real human prose (the Federalist Papers,
Moby-Dick, Walden) before release:

• not-just-x-but-y anchored on a preceding copula so it no longer flags
  ordinary correlative conjunctions ("not only... but...").
• puffery-words dropped the bare adjective "profound" and narrowed "in the
  heart of" to require a place object, both unguarded false-positive sources.
• em-dash-overuse, thats-how-x, and announced-takeaway scoped to real
  paragraphs (blank-line boundaries) instead of source lines, so hit counts
  no longer swing on Markdown line-wrapping.
• clause-triad-then removed: went 0-for-40 on its own description against
  the human corpus, and no reliable narrowing was found.
• no-x-no-y's rationale corrected to match what the pattern actually does
  (fires at two items; the frequency gap between human and model prose is
  the justification, not an item-count claim the pattern didn't enforce).