Skip to content

BIP 54: grammar improvements#2151

Merged
murchandamus merged 5 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
nervana21:20260406_bip54_clarity
May 7, 2026
Merged

BIP 54: grammar improvements#2151
murchandamus merged 5 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
nervana21:20260406_bip54_clarity

Conversation

@nervana21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR helps clarify some language used in BIP-54

@murchandamus murchandamus added Proposed BIP modification PR by non-owner to update BIP content Pending acceptance This BIP modification requires sign-off by the champion of the BIP being modified labels May 6, 2026
@murchandamus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc: @darosior for review

Comment thread bip-0054.md
@jonatack jonatack changed the title 20260406 bip54 clarity BIP 54: grammar improvements May 6, 2026
Comment thread bip-0054.md
Comment on lines +106 to +107
of transactions. This is because, in the Merkle tree construction, a 64-byte value may be
interpreted either as a transaction or as the concatenation of two 32-byte hashes. The former allows faking a block inclusion proof and the latter makes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

English newbie question: why prefer "concatenation" to "catenation"? Isn't it just more letter for the very same meaning? Is it simply that it's more natural to use the longer word?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They’re synonyms, but concatenation is the standard term in computer science and much more commonly used (maybe about a magnitude more often).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TIL! I hadn't previously known that "catenation" was a word!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@darosior darosior left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK af954ff

Thank you.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@murchandamus murchandamus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, and signed off by BIP Owner.

Thanks, @nervana21 for the improvements, thanks for the quick turnaround, @darosior.

@murchandamus murchandamus removed the Pending acceptance This BIP modification requires sign-off by the champion of the BIP being modified label May 7, 2026
@murchandamus murchandamus merged commit acf99fc into bitcoin:master May 7, 2026
4 checks passed
@nervana21 nervana21 deleted the 20260406_bip54_clarity branch May 7, 2026 10:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Proposed BIP modification PR by non-owner to update BIP content

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants