Skip to content

BIP65 formatting fixes#258

Merged
laanwj merged 3 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
petertodd:bip65-fix-spec-missing-case
Dec 8, 2015
Merged

BIP65 formatting fixes#258
laanwj merged 3 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
petertodd:bip65-fix-spec-missing-case

Conversation

@petertodd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Seems to be how people are writing BIP's these days.
Wasn't being displayed on github; adding an empty line prior to the spec
seems to fix this.
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2015
@laanwj laanwj merged commit 84779aa into bitcoin:master Dec 8, 2015
luke-jr pushed a commit to luke-jr/bips that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2018
…bitcoin#258)

Added an optional `c` field in the payment request specifying the
minimum `cltv_expiry` to use for the last htlc in the route. If
not provided, default value is 9.

This commit also clarifies how `channel_update` messages are only
to be used in the context of relaying payments, and how both htlc
amounts and expiries are to be calculated backwards from the values
provided in the payment request.

Not needing the `channel_update` for the first channel in a route also
means that it is possible to make a payment through a channel which 
hasn't had any announcements yet.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants