Skip to content

Fix typo for size of derivedhalf1 and derivedhalf2#28

Closed
cscott wants to merge 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
cscott:patch-3
Closed

Fix typo for size of derivedhalf1 and derivedhalf2#28
cscott wants to merge 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
cscott:patch-3

Conversation

@cscott
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cscott cscott commented Mar 5, 2014

The output of scrypt is 64 bytes; so each derivedhalf should be 32 bytes.

The output of scrypt is 64 bytes; so each derivedhalf should be 32 bytes.
@cscott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

cscott commented Mar 6, 2014

Pull request #29 also contains my changes, in addition to a few more. Closing in favor of #29.

@cscott cscott closed this Mar 6, 2014
real-or-random added a commit to real-or-random/bips that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2019
 - Clarify that x(P) and y(P) denote integers mod p and inline the very long footnote to make it more prominent. (This ensures that 
bitcoin#28 is insignificant, i.e., our algorithms are correct no matter if we reject signatures with `r >= p` explicitly.)
 - Don't rely on the implicit assumption that the "or" operator in our pseudocode is short-circuiting.
 - Don't use a pair to construct a point from it's coordinates to represent coordinate in batch verification. Instead, factor the coordinate computation out to a separate function lift_x. This is more consistent with the other algorithms that delegate coordinate computations to functions.
real-or-random added a commit to real-or-random/bips that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Make mypy type checker happy with ref impl after aggnonce=inf commit
guggero pushed a commit to guggero/bips that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
bip-taro-proof-file: unroll proof file to nested TLV, add exclusion proofs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant