Skip to content

Change to common *input* ownership assumption - #416

Merged
jnewbery merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
unknown repository
Jun 8, 2020
Merged

Change to common *input* ownership assumption#416
jnewbery merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
unknown repository

Conversation

@ghost

@ghost ghost commented Jun 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

As far as I know the term, as well as in the wiki that is linked, the term discussed here is called the common input ownership assumption, and not common wallet ownership assumption.

If I am mistaken here, and wallet is the intended word, then please dismiss and close the PR.


Congrats on #100 - this is incredible work!

@harding

harding commented Jun 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Yeah, I agree with the change and I don't know why I said "wallet" instead of "input". However, this PR also needs to make the same change to the link definition at the bottom of the newsletter or the page won't render correctly (that's why the tests are failing).

Thanks for the PR and the congrats!

@jonatack

jonatack commented Jun 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @MaxHillebrand, good catch! Can you force-push after updating the link name at the bottom?

@ghost

ghost commented Jun 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Sorry, I missed that link reference at the bottom... It's added now, but in a separate commit. Is this alright if you now do a squash merge commit @jonatack?

As far as I know the term, as well as in the wiki that is linked, the term discussed here is called the `common input ownership assumption`, and not `common wallet ownership assumption`.

If I am mistaken here, and `wallet` is the intended word, then please dismiss and close the PR.
@jnewbery
jnewbery merged commit 0418efb into bitcoinops:master Jun 8, 2020
@jnewbery

jnewbery commented Jun 8, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Squashed and merged. Thanks Max!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants