Fix BitExtraServices registration (#9586)#9587
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the service registration logic for Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/IServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (1)
25-25: Consider removing or repurposing thetrySingletonparameter.The service registration for
BitExtraServicesis now always scoped, rendering thetrySingletonparameter irrelevant for this service. If no additional logic depends ontrySingleton, you may remove or repurpose this parameter for clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Extensions/IServiceCollectionExtensions.cs(1 hunks)
closes #9586
Summary by CodeRabbit
BitExtraServicesas a scoped service.