Improve server connection exception detection in Boilerplate (#9740)#9741
Improve server connection exception detection in Boilerplate (#9740)#9741msynk merged 1 commit intobitfoundation:developfrom yasmoradi:9740
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve enhancing the exception handling mechanism in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Templates/Boilerplate/Bit.Boilerplate/src/Client/Boilerplate.Client.Core/Services/HttpMessageHandlers/ExceptionDelegatingHandler.cs (1)
55-56: LGTM! Clear exception handling logic.The explicit handling of ResourceValidationException improves type safety and properly passes the payload parameter.
Consider improving readability by breaking the ternary operation into multiple lines:
- Exception exp = exceptionType == typeof(ResourceValidationException) - ? new ResourceValidationException(restError.Message!, restError.Payload!) - : (Exception)Activator.CreateInstance(exceptionType, args.ToArray())!; + Exception exp = exceptionType == typeof(ResourceValidationException) + ? new ResourceValidationException( + restError.Message!, + restError.Payload!) + : (Exception)Activator.CreateInstance( + exceptionType, + args.ToArray())!;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Templates/Boilerplate/Bit.Boilerplate/src/Client/Boilerplate.Client.Core/Services/HttpMessageHandlers/ExceptionDelegatingHandler.cs(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build and test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Templates/Boilerplate/Bit.Boilerplate/src/Client/Boilerplate.Client.Core/Services/HttpMessageHandlers/ExceptionDelegatingHandler.cs (2)
3-3: LGTM! Appropriate namespace import.The addition of System.Net.Sockets namespace is well-placed and necessary for the new socket exception handling functionality.
80-80: LGTM! Enhanced server connection error detection.The addition of SocketException handling for HostNotFound errors improves the robustness of server connection detection.
Consider if other socket errors should also be treated as server connection issues. Run this script to check common socket errors in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Socket error handling implementation is appropriate and complete
The current implementation properly handles critical connection failures by:
- Catching HostNotFound for DNS resolution failures
- Covering other connection issues via HttpRequestException
- Consistently wrapping all server connectivity issues in ServerConnectionException
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other SocketException handling patterns in the codebase rg -l "SocketException|SocketError" --type cs # Search for specific socket error handling ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($expr) when ($expr is SocketException)' -l csLength of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full context of socket exception handling rg -B 5 -A 5 "SocketException|SocketError" --type cs # Get the full catch block implementation ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($expr) { $$$ SocketException $$$ }'Length of output: 2414
msynk
changed the title
2 participants
closes #9740
Summary by CodeRabbit