humanizer's guardrails keep my system from over-correcting. thank you

[welttowelt]

humanizer's dna has been in my personal writing system for months, merged with stop-slop and a few siblings into an obsidian rule set that runs before anything ships.

evaluated it against all its sources this week. the pieces i took back from yours today. the anti-compression rule (rewrite, don't delete), the cluster principle for detection (a single em dash means nothing), and the aphorism-formula catalog. anti-slop tools die by false positives and yours is the source that took that seriously.

if you want any of my additions back, crypto-specific tells or regression cases for the rules themselves, ask and i'll paste them here.

oli (@odin_free)

[blader]

Thank you for this unusually thoughtful feedback. It is especially useful to hear that the anti-compression rule, cluster principle, and false-positive restraint hold up in a real writing system. If you want to share focused regression cases here, they would be welcome. I am leaving this thread open.