Skip to content

MB-71216: Added Support for IVFRaBitQ Indexes#391

Merged
abhinavdangeti merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
rabitq
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

MB-71216: Added Support for IVFRaBitQ Indexes#391
abhinavdangeti merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
rabitq

Conversation

@Likith101
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Likith101 Likith101 commented Apr 8, 2026

  • Added new index factory string for IVFRaBitQ

@abhinavdangeti abhinavdangeti changed the title MB-71218: Add RaBitQ Indexes MB-71216: Add RaBitQ Indexes Apr 8, 2026
@abhinavdangeti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fix commit header and description.

@Likith101 Likith101 changed the title MB-71216: Add RaBitQ Indexes MB-71216: Add Support for IVFRaBitQ Indexes Apr 13, 2026
@Likith101 Likith101 changed the title MB-71216: Add Support for IVFRaBitQ Indexes MB-71216: Added Support for IVFRaBitQ Indexes Apr 13, 2026
@CascadingRadium
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

CascadingRadium commented Apr 20, 2026

Please rebase. Otherwise LGTM, will approve again once the deps are upgraded.

@abhinavdangeti abhinavdangeti merged commit 3468d01 into master Apr 21, 2026
9 checks passed
@abhinavdangeti abhinavdangeti deleted the rabitq branch April 21, 2026 16:15
abhinavdangeti pushed a commit to blevesearch/bleve that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2026
…2326)

- This change also comes with bug fixes in cases where we fail to create
a centroid index, but the application decides to fallback to the naive
merge algorithm instead of fast merge
- Brings in these fixes in zapx/v17:
* b7d79e6 Abhi Dangeti, Likith B | Address panic observed while
operating with file callbacks
(blevesearch/zapx#404)
* b4e42c5 Thejas-bhat | MB-71216: implement fast merge for binary index
class (blevesearch/zapx#393)
* ca1c2cf Thejas-bhat | make the `faissIndex` interface and
implementation more modular
(blevesearch/zapx#403)
* f330de0 Likith B | Process In-Memory Segment Bases Before Persisting
(blevesearch/zapx#402)
* 3468d01 Likith B | MB-71216: Added Support for IVFRaBitQ Indexes
(blevesearch/zapx#391)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants