Documentation and Explanation of blockcores POS #279
Merged
Conversation
sondreb
requested changes
Feb 15, 2021
Member
sondreb
left a comment
sondreb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good start, a few typos mentioned in comments.
| However such an output has no cryptographic strong link to the block itself, meaning an attacker can take the valid coinstake utxo and put it in another block the attacker created | ||
| and propagate that to the network, the attacker could then censor transactions at will. | ||
|
|
||
| By signing the block with the same key that ownes the UTXO peers can validate the blocl was created by the owner of the coinstake. |
sondreb
approved these changes
May 4, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.