Skip to content

Fix provider agent runtime projection - #3323

Open
asymetryk wants to merge 1 commit into
block:mainfrom
asymetryk:codex/fix-provider-runtime-redaction
Open

Fix provider agent runtime projection#3323
asymetryk wants to merge 1 commit into
block:mainfrom
asymetryk:codex/fix-provider-runtime-redaction

Conversation

@asymetryk

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • keep provider-backed agent profiles from projecting local runtime, ACP, MCP, startup, model, and environment configuration
  • keep the provider backend identifier and status visible
  • add an integration regression test with deliberately conflicting local fallback values

Motivation

Provider-backed agents can currently display local Claude/runtime configuration that is not authoritative for the remote provider and may expose environment values. This is a focused privacy-safe first slice of #3034.

Test evidence

  • just ci — passed
  • targeted Playwright integration test — passed
  • full profile.spec.ts integration suite — 26 passed; one unrelated existing media-proxy assertion failed because the mock returned buzz-media://localhost/... instead of http://127.0.0.1:54321/...

Risk and rollback

The change only affects owner profile rendering for agents whose backend type is provider. Local agents retain the existing runtime/config UI. Reverting this commit restores the previous projection.

Follow-up

Provider-specific editing/lifecycle UI remains tracked in #3034; this PR intentionally does not broaden provider mutation behavior.

Signed-off-by: Howard Shaw <asymetryk@outlook.com>
@asymetryk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 09d713507a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@asymetryk
asymetryk marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2026 14:56
@asymetryk
asymetryk requested a review from a team as a code owner July 28, 2026 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant