content: installation: cover SD card class recommendations#63
Merged
patrickelectric merged 1 commit intobluerobotics:latestfrom Oct 27, 2025
Merged
content: installation: cover SD card class recommendations#63patrickelectric merged 1 commit intobluerobotics:latestfrom
patrickelectric merged 1 commit intobluerobotics:latestfrom
Conversation
ES-Alexander
force-pushed
the
min-sd-spec
branch
from
9baa7af to
e8546cf
Compare
ES-Alexander
force-pushed
the
min-sd-spec
branch
from
e8546cf to
b4595c3
Compare
patrickelectric
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔎 PREVIEW 🔍
@voorloopnul suggested we add a warning/note about minimum SD card speeds, given some issues we've run into with people experiencing degraded performance when using old / low specification SD cards. From looking into the variety of available designations, this seems to represent some reasonable expectations:
I have included it on the installation page, as that's where it's most likely to be seen by users who do not buy a system with BlueOS pre-installed.
I'm undecided on whether it's worth including a warning about low quality cards that lie about their specs, or if that's excessive / out of scope.
bluerobotics/BlueOS#2405 would also be valuable, as a conditional check (regardless of stated ratings, including for degradation over time), and for a potential warning directly in the software, but a warning in the docs is at least a start (and hopefully helps avoid some issues before they even happen).