Add extra fields option for image and imagelist fields#3292
Merged
bobdenotter merged 4 commits intobolt:masterfrom Aug 24, 2022
Merged
Add extra fields option for image and imagelist fields#3292bobdenotter merged 4 commits intobolt:masterfrom
image and imagelist fields#3292bobdenotter merged 4 commits intobolt:masterfrom
Conversation
image fieldimage and imagelist fields
bobdenotter
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2022
Member
bobdenotter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did two ninja-edits! Looks good, otherwise! 👍
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For both
images andimagelists, you can now add an extra propertyextra:For now I have enabled
labelandplaceholder, but since it's an key,value-array we can expand it if needed. (I initially had it as:attrib: [ foo, bar, baz ]to mimick Bolt 3).This seems to work for me. Somehow the solution looks way simpler than I thought. So please double-check if I haven't missed anything.