docs: prefer design fixes over regression-only guards - #1722
Merged
Conversation
Size Report
Startup median (7 runs, lower is better):
Top changed chunks: no changes in the largest emitted chunks. |
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prefer fixing recurring error classes at the owning interface over accumulating regression tests and custom guards.
The guidance asks contributors to make invalid states or paths impossible with types, registries, or a single construction path, then keep only the smallest interface-level regression as evidence. Reviewers should stop extending guards that reconstruct compiler or schema behavior and move the invariant to its source of truth instead.
Validation
Docs-only change across two files; runtime and device validation do not apply.