-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Month 3 Plan
The plan's distinctive month and the heart of the project's unique claim. Being able to measure an agent system — to say "better" or "worse" with a number — is something very few people can do.
- Why an AI system must be tested; why LLM outputs are probabilistic
- Measuring agent success: did it complete, did it pick the right tool, in how many steps, at what cost
- Regression testing logic
- Eval set design
- LLM-as-a-judge: its power and its limits
- Eval set · [ ] Task success rate · [ ] Tool selection accuracy · [ ] Step efficiency
- Ground truth · [ ] LLM-as-a-judge · [ ] Regression · [ ] Non-determinism
- Eval pipeline · [ ] Baseline
- By hand, an eval set of 30–50 tasks (expected result, tools that should be selected, reasonable step count)
- Task success measurement
- Tool selection and step efficiency measurement
- LLM-as-a-judge for answer quality (state the inconsistency risk honestly in the README)
- A one-command measurement pipeline + summary report
- Baseline recorded
- Prove Month 2's system-prompt hypothesis with numbers
Why do we build the eval set by hand? Because the eval set itself is the "correct" definition of the system. If you measure with an unaudited ruler, all your improvements drift toward error. A small but audited set is far more valuable than a large but unaudited one.
Split the tasks and swap at the rotation — you decide who takes what. Two rough tracks: (a) metric implementation (success, tool selection, steps) + LLM-as-a-judge + baseline, (b) eval set writing + harness + reporting/CI integration.
It matters that the eval set is written by both people: a set written by one person carries that person's blind spots.
- Manifesto video: "Everyone builds AI agents but no one measures whether they work well"
- Eval report screen recording
- A comparison clip showing the scores of two system prompts side by side
- "How to test an AI system" educational thread
AgentLens
Project
Working Cadence
Months
Reference