v1.17.2

RTSP/ONVIF protocol confirmation pass across the entire ACTi brand (follow-up to 1.17.0/1.17.1), plus 1 new camera and several data-quality fixes surfaced during verification.

Added

• E815 (5MP outdoor zoom dome), sourced from an official printed ACTi datasheet (doc rev. 150610) — confirmed RTSP + ONVIF.
• Discovered and used ACTi's internal spec AJAX endpoints (newPopupSpecifications.ashx + newPopupSpecifications_value.ashx, the same JSON backing the website's own product-page widget) to pull full official specs directly for the majority of this pass, instead of manual per-model PDF exports.

Changed

• RTSP + ONVIF now explicitly confirmed for 93 of 119 ACTi cameras (up from a handful at the start of this pass), each cross-referenced against an official ACTi source (?tab=specifications page or a downloadable PDF datasheet) requiring an explicit Network Protocol & Service list containing RTSP and an ONVIF Compliant row — never inferred from one without the other.
• Full spec backfill (sensor, lens, power, dimensions, weight, IP rating, video codecs/max fps, audio, detection range, ONVIF profile list) applied across effectively the whole brand, regardless of protocol-confirmation outcome.
• 20 cameras remain genuinely unconfirmed, each with the specific reason recorded in its features: 11 have ONVIF but no RTSP row (A371-P2, A372, A372-P1, A374, A374-P1, A570-P1, A570-P2, A810, Q711, Q75, Z413-P1), 3 have RTSP but no ONVIF row (Q120, Q121, VMGB-370), and 6 have neither documented (A432, A432-P1, A973, Q170, Z64, Z914). 12 of the 20 were additionally cross-checked against a second, independent official source (a downloadable PDF datasheet distinct from the specifications-tab widget) — all returned the same result, confirming this isn't a gap in the widget, it's a genuine gap in ACTi's own published documentation for these specific models.
• The 6 genuinely-analog Y-series cameras (Y31, Y32, Y35, Y55, Y71, Y72) correctly retain no protocols field — not applicable over coax.

Fixed

• Bug: video.max_fps extraction was picking the highest FPS value anywhere in a camera's frame-rate table, but the schema defines the field as "Max FPS at highest resolution" — a different (usually lower) number for cameras whose fps drops at their top resolution tier. Corrected across every camera processed in this pass.
• A973, Z64: had been marked RTSP+ONVIF confirmed in an earlier round of this audit without an actual Network Protocol & Service row ever being checked for either model — corrected to unconfirmed on cross-verification against the live spec API (ONVIF-only, same pattern as several other models in this pass). Z64's official PDF datasheet does contain the string "RTSP", but only inside a Security row (HTTP/RTSP/ONVIF(WSSE) authentication schemes) rather than an explicit protocol list — noted, but not treated as sufficient confirmation.
• Z416, Z722, Z84: IP rating corrected IP67 → IP68 (repeat confirmation from the live spec page); Z722's operating temperature widened -30~60°C → -40~60°C to match the official sheet.
• Q170: IP rating reconciled after conflicting across three checks (IP68 web page → IP67 dated PDF datasheet → IP68 web page again, re-checked) — settled on IP68 given the live page confirms it twice against a single older PDF; still has no protocols documented on any of the three sources checked.
• 15 cameras (A416, A820, A88, B416, B76A, I96, I98, KCM-5611, Q550, Z47, Z49, Z714, Z810, Z812, Z86) were sitting on a much thinner, pre-audit-standard data shape (legacy storage object, third-party reseller-site sources, no configs block, generic feature bullets) — refreshed to the full spec depth used throughout the rest of this audit.

---