[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/AlexanderDokuchaev/md-dead-link-check: v1.1.0 → v1.2.0

Summary by Sourcery

Chores:

• Update md-dead-link-check pre-commit hook to v1.2.0.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

Changed Files

File	Status
.pre-commit-config.yaml	0% smaller

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the md-dead-link-check pre-commit hook to the latest version (v1.2.0) in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated the md-dead-link-check pre-commit hook to the latest version.	Updated the revision of the md-dead-link-check hook from v1.1.0 to v1.2.0.	.pre-commit-config.yaml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, pre-commit-ci[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

CI Feedback 🧐

(Feedback updated until commit 68a8a65)

A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

Action: Awesome_Lint

Failed stage: Run npx awesome-lint [❌]

Failed test name: remark-lint:awesome-list-item

Failure summary: The action failed due to linting errors in the markdown file. There were 47 errors detected by remark-lint, primarily of two types: 1. "List item description must start with valid casing" (most errors) 2. "List item description must end with proper punctuation" (lines 444 and 454) The errors appear in multiple list items across the file, with line numbers and character positions specified in the log (e.g., line 173:44, 174:44, etc.).

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 440: ✖ 173:44 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 441: ✖ 174:44 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 442: ✖ 187:42 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 443: ✖ 200:58 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 444: ✖ 207:51 List item description must end with proper punctuation remark-lint:awesome-list-item 445: ✖ 208:46 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 446: ✖ 229:52 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 447: ✖ 230:44 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 448: ✖ 231:64 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 449: ✖ 232:57 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 450: ✖ 233:55 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 451: ✖ 234:54 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 452: ✖ 238:63 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 453: ✖ 241:71 List item description must start with valid casing remark-lint:awesome-list-item 454: ✖ 250:103 List item description must end with proper punctuation remark-lint:awesome-list-item 455: 47 errors 456: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. 457: Post job cleanup.

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains version updates and formatting changes

Technical Context:

Version and formatting changes detected, which include:

• Package version updates
• Dependency version changes
• Code formatting adjustments
• Whitespace modifications
• Structural formatting changes

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team