feat: expose renderStep prop of Steps

[amanabiy]

Description

This PR makes the renderStep available to be used with our new thinking pattern. Se related links to learn more.

Related links, issue #, if available: izviAVvSF39f

How has this been tested?

Review checklist

The following items are to be evaluated by the author(s) and the reviewer(s).

Correctness

• Changes include appropriate documentation updates.
• Changes are backward-compatible if not indicated, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
• Changes do not include unsupported browser features, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
• Changes were manually tested for accessibility, see accessibility guidelines.

Security

• If the code handles URLs: all URLs are validated through the checkSafeUrl function.

Testing

• Changes are covered with new/existing unit tests?
• Changes are covered with new/existing integration tests?

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.40%. Comparing base (eb9e00b) to head (2ce98dd).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4466   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.40%   97.40%           
=======================================
  Files         933      933           
  Lines       29486    29486           
  Branches    10698    10698           
=======================================
  Hits        28720    28720           
  Misses        718      718           
  Partials       48       48           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[NathanZlion]

Approved, one slight question though. Is the size of the icon intentional? Just making sure.

[timogasda]

Shouldn't these be two separate PRs/commits for the sake of separation of concerns? @amanabiy

[amanabiy]

@NathanZlion I confirmed with the designer that this is the expected icon size, it's a tiny icon meant to sit within its 16px × 16px container. I've also separated the icon addition into a separate PR: #4468