Update benchmark workflow to omit fails based on performance - #4
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Benchmark cosy-luigi
Details
| Benchmark suite | Current: 363e6fd | Previous: 4cf1495 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
benchmarks/test_benchmark_chain_100.py::test_benchmark_chain_creation |
0.6663854458777609 iter/sec (stddev: 0.030046904552745064) |
0.655063844135017 iter/sec (stddev: 0.009349557267338666) |
0.98 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Benchmark cosy-luigi'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 0.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 363e6fd | Previous: 4cf1495 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
benchmarks/test_benchmark_chain_100.py::test_benchmark_chain_creation |
0.6663854458777609 iter/sec (stddev: 0.030046904552745064) |
0.655063844135017 iter/sec (stddev: 0.009349557267338666) |
0.98 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 315 315
Branches 21 21
=========================================
Hits 315 315
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
No description provided.