fix(scraper): issue on video size, reproduce the bug#67
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Hello @vvatelot ! This difference between the two results is due to the fact that when we have a _transferSize = -1 then we opt to retrieve the content-length of the response, a step not performed by haranalyzer. In response, I propose the following for the PR: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following #58, it seems that on certain analysis the result is wrong with video resources. When using haralyzer, we can confirm that on a given page the results from the har analysis seems to be wrong:
Proposition:
arrow downduring the analysis