Skip to content

Conversation

@tbg
Copy link
Member

@tbg tbg commented Oct 31, 2025

The recently added logging showed that n2 and n3 just weren't even considered
for starting the rangefeed. Likely this was because the descriptors weren't
gossiped yet (this was corroborated by gossip logging).

Rather than waiting for specific preconditions that "likely" fix
the problem for the particular version of the code, widen the scope
of the retry loop to re-establish the rangefeed until it does get
scheduled were it needs to for the test to succeed.

Closes #156341.

Epic: none

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@tbg tbg force-pushed the TestFlowControlSendQueueRangeFeed branch from 4ac0cbe to 4c72494 Compare October 31, 2025 12:40
@tbg tbg marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 12:40
@tbg tbg requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2025 12:40
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the o-AI-Review-Potential-Issue-Detected AI reviewer found potential issue. Never assign manually—auto-applied by GH action only. label Oct 31, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

The recently added logging showed that n2 and n3 just weren't even considered
for starting the rangefeed. Likely this was because the descriptors weren't
gossiped yet (this was corroborated by gossip logging).

Rather than waiting for specific preconditions that "likely" fix
the problem for the particular version of the code, widen the scope
of the retry loop to re-establish the rangefeed until it does get
scheduled were it needs to for the test to succeed.

Epic: none
@tbg tbg force-pushed the TestFlowControlSendQueueRangeFeed branch from 4c72494 to cf1382a Compare October 31, 2025 12:43
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevendanna stevendanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@tbg
Copy link
Member Author

tbg commented Oct 31, 2025

TFTR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@craig craig bot merged commit 5d3fb6c into cockroachdb:master Oct 31, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@tbg
Copy link
Member Author

tbg commented Oct 31, 2025

blathers backport 25.4 25.3 25.2 25.1

@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Based on the specified backports for this PR, I applied new labels to the following linked issue(s). Please adjust the labels as needed to match the branches actually affected by the issue(s), including adding any known older branches.


Issue #156341: branch-release-25.1, branch-release-25.2, branch-release-25.3, branch-release-25.4.


🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

o-AI-Review-Potential-Issue-Detected AI reviewer found potential issue. Never assign manually—auto-applied by GH action only. target-release-26.1.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

kv/kvserver: TestFlowControlSendQueueRangeFeed failed

3 participants