TCE-1577 Disable by default all custom rules - #32
Conversation
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
| Metric | Results |
|---|---|
| Complexity | 0 |
AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
The PR implements logic to disable custom rules by default, specifically targeting those prefixed with 'codacy.'. While Codacy analysis reports the changes are up to standards, there is a critical lack of unit tests to verify the core logic modification in isEnabledByDefault. Furthermore, the definition of 'custom rules' might be incomplete as other categories like 'generic.secrets' are handled specially in this file but are not excluded by the new logic. The absence of a PR description makes it difficult to confirm the intended scope of 'custom rules'.
About this PR
- The PR description is empty, and no unit tests were provided to verify the changes to the rule enablement logic. Documentation and tests are required to ensure the 'codacy.' prefix check correctly covers the intended scope without regressions.
Test suggestions
- A rule with 'high' confidence and 'codacy.' prefix returns false for isEnabledByDefault.
- A rule with 'medium' confidence and 'codacy.' prefix returns false for isEnabledByDefault.
- A rule with 'high' confidence and no 'codacy.' prefix returns true for isEnabledByDefault.
- A rule with 'low' confidence returns false for isEnabledByDefault.
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. A rule with 'high' confidence and 'codacy.' prefix returns false for isEnabledByDefault.
2. A rule with 'medium' confidence and 'codacy.' prefix returns false for isEnabledByDefault.
3. A rule with 'high' confidence and no 'codacy.' prefix returns true for isEnabledByDefault.
4. A rule with 'low' confidence returns false for isEnabledByDefault.
TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback
No description provided.