docs: document automatic removal on GitHub repository archive TAROT-3757

[jorgebraz]

Summary

• Archived repositories are read-only and don't need further code-quality analysis, so since July 7, 2026 Codacy automatically removes a repository from Codacy when it's archived on GitHub (Cloud or Enterprise Cloud). GitLab and Bitbucket aren't affected.
• This is going-forward only: repositories already archived on GitHub before July 7, 2026 aren't retroactively removed.
• If a repository is later unarchived, Codacy doesn't automatically bring it back — it needs to be re-added manually.
• Documents this in organizations/managing-repositories.md (new section) and the provider-support table in organizations/what-are-organizations.md, following the same pattern used for the repository-transfer cleanup feature (TAROT-3749, PR docs: document automatic cleanup on GitHub repository transfer TAROT-3749 #2696).

Jira: https://codacy.atlassian.net/browse/TAROT-3757

Preview

https://tarot-3757-archived-repository-clea--docs-codacy.netlify.app

Pages updated:

• Managing repositories → Repository archived on GitHub (new section)
• What are organizations → Updates on the Git provider (new table column + note)

Test plan

• Verified all new internal links/anchors resolve to existing files and section ids
• Check the preview links above to confirm rendering

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 54.29 (🔴 -0.01)

File	Readability
what-are-organizations.md	48.49 (🟢 +0)
managing-repositories.md	52.32 (🔴 -1.89)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
what-are-organizations.md	48.49	20.68	10.68	14.1	14.73	6.86
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0
managing-repositories.md	52.32	25.19	10.54	14.5	13.46	6.35
	🔴 -1.89	🔴 -0.91	🔴 -0.23	🔴 -0.7	🔴 -0.23	🟢 +0

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	54.29	43.29	10.89	12.3	12.24	8.01
	🔴 -0.01	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation to reflect that archiving a repository on GitHub Cloud or GitHub Enterprise Cloud automatically removes it from Codacy starting July 7, 2026. The feedback suggests minor grammatical improvements to avoid word repetition in the new section and to fix a sentence fragment in the updated feature support table footnote.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

This documentation update correctly captures the new automated repository removal behavior for archived GitHub Cloud and GitHub Enterprise Cloud repositories, effective July 7, 2026. The changes include the necessary provider constraints and operational details (e.g., manual re-addition after unarchiving).

Codacy analysis indicates the PR is up to standards with no new quality issues. There are no security flaws or major logic bugs that should prevent merging.

Test suggestions

• Found recommended test scenario: Verify the 'Repository archived on GitHub' section exists in managing-repositories.md with correct constraints on providers and the July 7, 2026 date.
• Found recommended test scenario: Verify the 'Archive repository' column in what-are-organizations.md reflects 'Yes**' for GitHub Cloud and 'No' for GitLab/Bitbucket/GitHub Enterprise (Server).
• Found recommended test scenario: Verify the foot-note (**) in what-are-organizations.md correctly links to the new documentation section and mentions GitHub Enterprise Cloud support.

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}