docs: Add admin-app framework CSS files to license - #82
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 57 minutes and 43 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTwo CSS file paths ( ChangesLicense File Update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Summary by QodoDocument admin-app framework CSS assets in third‑party license Description
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (1)
|
7435d2d to
df01564
Compare
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review |
df01564 to
fdea04f
Compare
…cope Replace brittle file-by-file enumeration with a directory-level description covering all current and future SLASHED CSS Framework assets bundled in the plugin. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JZ6EMT38ejDPmj4qULPwDc
fdea04f to
5f552ab
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
SLASHED-for-WP/license.txt (1)
347-355: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winAdd the missing shipped CSS assets to the attribution list.
license.txtstill omits at leastassets/admin-app/app.cssandintegrations/bricks/assets/editor.css, both of which are enqueued at runtime. If this list is meant to cover all framework CSS bundles, include every shipped entrypoint, not just the current subset.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@SLASHED-for-WP/license.txt` around lines 347 - 355, The attribution list in license.txt is incomplete for shipped CSS bundles; add every runtime-enqueued CSS entrypoint to the bundled-files section. Update the list near the existing dist/slashed.* and assets/admin-app/app.css entries to also cover the missing shipped assets, including integrations/bricks/assets/editor.css, so the license notice matches all distributed framework CSS outputs.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@SLASHED-for-WP/license.txt`:
- Around line 347-355: The attribution list in license.txt is incomplete for
shipped CSS bundles; add every runtime-enqueued CSS entrypoint to the
bundled-files section. Update the list near the existing dist/slashed.* and
assets/admin-app/app.css entries to also cover the missing shipped assets,
including integrations/bricks/assets/editor.css, so the license notice matches
all distributed framework CSS outputs.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 4960a0c3-2418-410e-b87f-49359eb5183e
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
SLASHED-for-WP/license.txt
2 participants
Summary
Updates the license.txt file to include references to the admin-app framework CSS files that are part of the SLASHED CSS Framework distribution. This ensures proper attribution and licensing documentation for all framework CSS assets.
Type
Checklist
feat:,fix:,docs:, …)npm testpassesnpm run lintpasses (stylelint +php -l)npm run verifypasses (version metadata in sync)dist/,data/inventory.json,data/classes-hints.jsoncome fromupdate-framework/build:data)CHANGELOG.mdupdated under## [Unreleased](for user-facing changes)editor-app/admin-appsource changedNotes
This is a documentation-only change to the license file. No source code modifications or functional changes are included.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01JZ6EMT38ejDPmj4qULPwDc
Summary by CodeRabbit