Skip to content

Conversation

@Ishiihara
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Ishiihara
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ewencp Should be an quick review.

@ewencp
Copy link
Contributor

ewencp commented Jul 14, 2016

@Ishiihara LGTM. I even wonder what small integer values would make sense (int8 seems unlikely, but maybe even int16 could be reasonable in some cases). I'm fine not removing anymore, but as long as we're removing some, we might want to consider what our minimum viable integer-as-unique-id is.

@Ishiihara Ishiihara merged commit dafb397 into master Jul 15, 2016
@Ishiihara Ishiihara deleted the key-type branch July 15, 2016 23:42
sp-gupta added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants