Added multi-step structured installation coordinator with plan support fixes #8 #190
Conversation
WalkthroughThis PR introduces cortex-linux, a Python project featuring an AI-powered CLI tool for software installation. It includes packaging configuration, a core package with CLI and installation coordination subsystems, comprehensive test coverage with mocks, and updates to existing test imports. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor User
participant CLI as CortexCLI
participant Interpreter as CommandInterpreter
participant Coordinator as InstallationCoordinator
participant System as OS/Subprocess
User->>CLI: install(software, execute=True)
CLI->>CLI: _get_api_key() [OpenAI/Anthropic]
CLI->>CLI: _get_provider()
rect rgba(200, 220, 255, 0.3)
Note over CLI: Planning Phase
CLI->>Interpreter: generate_commands(software)
Interpreter-->>CLI: list of commands
CLI->>CLI: _print_status("Analyzing...")
end
rect rgba(220, 255, 220, 0.3)
Note over CLI,Coordinator: Execution Phase
CLI->>Coordinator: execute()
loop For each command
Coordinator->>System: subprocess.run(command, timeout)
System-->>Coordinator: stdout, stderr, return_code
Coordinator->>Coordinator: update InstallationStep status
Coordinator->>CLI: progress_callback(step_index, total, step)
CLI->>CLI: _print_status(command progress)
end
Coordinator-->>CLI: InstallationResult
end
CLI->>CLI: _print_success(duration)
CLI-->>User: exit code 0
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45–60 minutes
Key areas requiring attention:
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
|
@dhvll as you suggested I closed previous pull requests and creating new pull request each for specific for that issue on new branch. please review it. if any changes @ me here or mention me on discord ;) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
LLM/test_interpreter.py (1)
4-9: Consider using relative imports or package installation.While the sys.path manipulation works, consider either:
- Using relative imports (
from ..interpreter import ...)- Installing the package in development mode (
pip install -e .)This would make the tests more maintainable and align with the new setup.py configuration.
test/test_coordinator.py (1)
4-15: Consider using package installation for imports.Similar to the test_interpreter.py file, consider installing the package in development mode (
pip install -e .) instead of manipulating sys.path. This aligns better with the new setup.py configuration.cortex/cli.py (3)
8-8: Consider removing sys.path manipulation.Modifying
sys.pathat import time is an anti-pattern for installed packages. Since the project includessetup.pyfor proper package installation, the imports should resolve correctly without this manipulation. This line may cause issues in production environments or when the package is installed via pip.Apply this diff to remove the sys.path manipulation:
-sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..')) - from LLM.interpreter import CommandInterpreter
66-68: Consider extracting spinner iteration count.The hard-coded value
10for spinner animation iterations could be extracted as a class constant or configuration parameter for better maintainability.Apply this diff to extract the magic number:
class CortexCLI: def __init__(self): self.spinner_chars = ['⠋', '⠙', '⠹', '⠸', '⠼', '⠴', '⠦', '⠧', '⠇', '⠏'] self.spinner_idx = 0 + self.spinner_iterations = 10Then use it in the install method:
- for _ in range(10): + for _ in range(self.spinner_iterations): self._animate_spinner("Analyzing system requirements...")
131-133: Catching bare Exception can hide unexpected errors.The broad
Exceptioncatch at line 131 can mask unexpected errors and make debugging difficult. Consider either catching more specific exception types or at least logging the full exception traceback for debugging purposes.Apply this diff to add logging for unexpected errors:
except Exception as e: - self._print_error(f"Unexpected error: {str(e)}") + import traceback + self._print_error(f"Unexpected error: {str(e)}") + if os.environ.get('DEBUG'): + traceback.print_exc() return 1Based on static analysis hints
test/test_cli.py (2)
6-6: Consider removing sys.path manipulation.Similar to the CLI module, this sys.path manipulation should not be necessary if the package is properly installed for testing (e.g., with
pip install -e .).Apply this diff:
-sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..')) - from cortex.cli import CortexCLI, main
42-56: Strengthen print method test assertions.These tests patch stdout/stderr but don't verify the actual output or that the print functions were called correctly. The assertions
self.assertTrue(True)andself.assertTrue(mock_stdout.write.called or print)are weak and don't validate behavior.Apply this diff to improve the tests:
@patch('sys.stdout') def test_print_status(self, mock_stdout): - self.cli._print_status("🧠", "Test message") - self.assertTrue(mock_stdout.write.called or print) + with patch('builtins.print') as mock_print: + self.cli._print_status("🧠", "Test message") + mock_print.assert_called_once_with("🧠 Test message") - @patch('sys.stderr') - def test_print_error(self, mock_stderr): - self.cli._print_error("Test error") - self.assertTrue(True) + def test_print_error(self): + with patch('builtins.print') as mock_print: + self.cli._print_error("Test error") + mock_print.assert_called_once() + args, kwargs = mock_print.call_args + self.assertIn("Test error", args[0]) + self.assertEqual(kwargs.get('file'), sys.stderr) - @patch('sys.stdout') - def test_print_success(self, mock_stdout): - self.cli._print_success("Test success") - self.assertTrue(True) + def test_print_success(self): + with patch('builtins.print') as mock_print: + self.cli._print_success("Test success") + mock_print.assert_called_once_with("✅ Test success")Based on static analysis hints
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.gitignore(1 hunks)LLM/test_interpreter.py(10 hunks)MANIFEST.in(1 hunks)cortex/__init__.py(1 hunks)cortex/cli.py(1 hunks)cortex/coordinator.py(1 hunks)setup.py(1 hunks)test/run_all_tests.py(1 hunks)test/test_cli.py(1 hunks)test/test_coordinator.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (6)
LLM/test_interpreter.py (1)
LLM/interpreter.py (3)
CommandInterpreter(12-158)APIProvider(7-9)parse(131-145)
test/test_cli.py (3)
cortex/cli.py (8)
CortexCLI(14-133)_get_api_key(19-24)_get_provider(26-31)_print_status(33-34)_print_error(36-37)_print_success(39-40)install(52-133)_animate_spinner(42-46)LLM/interpreter.py (1)
parse(131-145)cortex/coordinator.py (1)
execute(202-249)
test/test_coordinator.py (1)
cortex/coordinator.py (12)
InstallationCoordinator(44-300)InstallationStep(19-32)StepStatus(10-15)install_docker(303-357)example_cuda_install_plan(360-385)duration(29-32)from_plan(78-124)execute(202-249)add_rollback_command(198-200)verify_installation(251-273)get_summary(275-296)export_log(298-300)
cortex/coordinator.py (1)
cortex/cli.py (1)
progress_callback(86-93)
cortex/__init__.py (1)
cortex/cli.py (1)
main(136-172)
cortex/cli.py (2)
LLM/interpreter.py (2)
CommandInterpreter(12-158)parse(131-145)cortex/coordinator.py (3)
InstallationCoordinator(44-300)StepStatus(10-15)execute(202-249)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.4)
LLM/test_interpreter.py
82-82: Unused method argument: mock_openai
(ARG002)
test/test_cli.py
28-28: Unused method argument: mock_stderr
(ARG002)
48-48: Unused method argument: mock_stderr
(ARG002)
53-53: Unused method argument: mock_stdout
(ARG002)
cortex/coordinator.py
65-65: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
102-102: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
(TRY003)
134-135: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception
(S110)
134-134: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
144-144: subprocess call with shell=True identified, security issue
(S602)
173-173: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
177-177: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
189-189: subprocess call with shell=True identified, security issue
(S602)
195-195: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
196-196: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
259-259: subprocess call with shell=True identified, security issue
(S602)
269-269: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
271-271: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
cortex/cli.py
123-123: Consider moving this statement to an else block
(TRY300)
129-129: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
131-131: Do not catch blind exception: Exception
(BLE001)
132-132: Use explicit conversion flag
Replace with conversion flag
(RUF010)
🔇 Additional comments (27)
MANIFEST.in (1)
1-5: LGTM!The packaging manifest correctly includes documentation, package code, and dependencies. This aligns well with the setup.py configuration.
test/run_all_tests.py (1)
6-17: LGTM!The test runner correctly discovers and executes all test modules with appropriate verbosity and exit code handling.
LLM/test_interpreter.py (1)
17-225: LGTM!The updated patch targets (
openai.OpenAIandanthropic.Anthropic) are more precise and correctly match the actual import paths used in the implementation.Note: The static analysis hint about unused
mock_openaiargument on line 82 is a false positive—the decorator requires this parameter..gitignore (1)
1-30: LGTM!The .gitignore file includes comprehensive and standard Python-specific exclusions for build artifacts, caches, virtual environments, and distribution files.
cortex/coordinator.py (14)
10-16: LGTM!The StepStatus enum provides clear state tracking for installation steps.
18-32: LGTM!The InstallationStep dataclass is well-designed with appropriate fields for tracking command execution, timing, and results.
35-41: LGTM!The InstallationResult dataclass provides a comprehensive summary of the installation process with all necessary fields.
47-75: LGTM!The constructor is well-designed with appropriate validation of inputs and clear initialization logic. The static analysis hint about exception message length (line 65) is overly pedantic for this context.
77-124: LGTM!The
from_planclassmethod provides an elegant way to construct a coordinator from structured plans, with intelligent defaults for rollback behavior based on plan content. The static analysis hint about exception message length (line 102) is overly pedantic.
126-135: LGTM!The logging method correctly handles file operations with timestamps. The broad exception handling with pass (lines 134-135) is acceptable here since logging failures shouldn't interrupt the installation process.
137-178: LGTM with security context.The command execution logic is robust with proper timeout handling and error capture. The use of
shell=True(line 144) is flagged by static analysis but is appropriate here since:
- The tool's purpose is to execute shell commands
- Commands come from user input or curated plans, not arbitrary external sources
- Shell features (pipes, redirects) are needed for the Docker installation workflow
The broad exception handling (line 173) provides necessary resilience for command execution.
180-196: LGTM!The rollback logic correctly executes commands in reverse order and handles failures gracefully. The broad exception handling (line 195) ensures rollback failures don't crash the coordinator.
198-200: LGTM!Simple and clear method for registering rollback commands.
202-249: LGTM!The execute method provides comprehensive orchestration with proper progress tracking, error handling, rollback triggering, and structured result reporting.
251-273: LGTM!The verification method provides a clean way to validate installations with per-command success tracking.
275-300: LGTM!The summary and export methods provide clear ways to retrieve and persist installation results.
303-357: LGTM!The Docker installation function demonstrates best practices:
- Modern signed keyring approach using
/etc/apt/keyrings/docker.gpg(lines 314-326)- Proper rollback commands for service management
- Post-installation verification
This is a solid reference implementation.
360-385: LGTM!The example CUDA plan provides a good template for complex installation workflows with verification steps.
cortex/__init__.py (1)
1-2: LGTM!The package initialization correctly exposes the CLI entry point and version, aligning with the setup.py configuration.
setup.py (1)
1-43: LGTM!The setup.py configuration is well-structured with:
- Dynamic reading of README and requirements
- Proper metadata and classifiers
- Console script entry point matching the package structure
- Support for package data via MANIFEST.in
test/test_coordinator.py (4)
18-32: LGTM!The InstallationStep tests provide good coverage of creation and duration calculation.
35-255: LGTM!Comprehensive test coverage for coordinator initialization, execution modes, error handling, callbacks, logging, and rollback functionality. The mocking strategy is appropriate and the tests are well-structured.
257-333: LGTM!Excellent coverage of verification, summary, export, and timing functionality with proper resource cleanup for temporary files.
336-372: LGTM!Good integration tests for the Docker installation workflow and CUDA plan structure validation.
cortex/cli.py (1)
136-173: LGTM! Well-structured CLI entry point.The main function provides comprehensive help text, clear examples, and proper argument handling. The subcommand structure allows for future extensibility.
test/test_cli.py (2)
16-41: LGTM! Comprehensive API key and provider tests.These tests properly cover the environment variable lookup logic for both OpenAI and Anthropic API keys, including the missing key scenario.
57-203: LGTM! Comprehensive installation flow tests.These tests provide excellent coverage of the installation workflow including:
- API key validation
- Dry-run and execution modes
- Success and failure scenarios
- Exception handling (ValueError, RuntimeError, generic Exception)
- CLI argument parsing and command dispatch
- Spinner animation behavior
The proper use of mocks prevents actual API calls and command execution during testing.
|
🎯 Closing for MVP Focus This issue is being closed to help the team focus on MVP-critical features (#1-45). This is NOT abandoned - it's an important feature we'll revisit after MVP completion. Timeline:
Want to work on this anyway? Tracking: Labeled as Thanks for understanding! 🚀 — Mike (@mikejmorgan-ai) |
2 participants
Summary
Testing
this satisfy everything mentioned.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
Chores