Skip to content

Conversation

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sahilbhatane Sahilbhatane commented Nov 25, 2025

Summary

structured the project and add instruction to contributing.md and developer-guide.md.
also changed cli.py to adjust to new import path.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation update

Checklist

Testing

needed to add Path of each file referred in test scripts, done with import os and added path of files related to test scripts mentioned. (import path update)
run run_all_test.py to test...
all test passed.
image

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added interactive conflict resolution for package installation with user preference saving
    • Introduced configuration management system (list, get, set, reset, export, import)
    • Added customizable user preferences for AI behavior, package settings, and UI options
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error messaging for missing API keys and installation status feedback
  • Documentation

    • Added comprehensive developer guide
  • Chores

    • Reorganized project structure and cleaned up data files
    • Updated import paths and test infrastructure

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@Sahilbhatane Sahilbhatane self-assigned this Nov 25, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 25, 2025 16:16
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR reorganizes project structure by moving documentation to appropriate directories, implements a comprehensive YAML-based user preferences and configuration system for Cortex CLI, adds interactive conflict resolution workflows for package installation, enhances CLI with config management commands, removes legacy data files, and updates test imports to use the cortex package namespace.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
File Structure & Documentation Reorganization
Developer-Guide.md, docs/Developer-Guide.md, Contributing.md, .gitignore
Deleted root-level Developer-Guide.md; added docs/Developer-Guide.md with comprehensive dev guide; updated Contributing.md to reference the new developer guide and emphasize file structure maintenance; added Cortex-specific ignore rules to .gitignore for data files while excluding data/contributors.json
Legacy Data File Cleanup
bounties_pending.json, issue_status.json, payments_history.json, pr_status.json
Removed four JSON data files containing static snapshot data (empty or historical records) from repository root
User Preferences & Configuration System
cortex/user_preferences.py
Added complete YAML-backed configuration management module with enums (VerbosityLevel, AICreativity), nested dataclasses for config domains (ConfirmationSettings, AutoUpdateSettings, AISettings, PackageSettings, ConflictSettings), PreferencesManager class with load/save, dot-notation accessors, validation, backup, and JSON import/export capabilities
CLI Enhancement for Config & Conflict Resolution
cortex/cli.py
Added interactive conflict resolution workflow via _resolve_conflicts_interactive and _ask_save_preference methods; introduced new public config() method supporting list/get/set/reset/validate/info/export/import actions; integrated DependencyResolver for pre-installation conflict detection; reworked user-facing messages to use labeled prefixes; added config command dispatch in CLI help and main interface
Test Infrastructure Setup
test/__init__.py
Created test package initializer
New Conflict & Config Tests
test/test_conflict_ui.py
Added extensive test suite for interactive conflict resolution UI, preference persistence, config management commands (list/get/set/reset/export/import), and conflict detection integration with DependencyResolver mocking
Test Import Path Updates
test/test_context_memory.py, test/test_error_parser.py, test/test_installation_history.py, test/test_installation_verifier.py, test/test_llm_router.py, test/test_logging_system.py
Updated all test files to import from cortex package namespace (e.g., cortex.context_memory, cortex.error_parser) by adding sys.path adjustments; updated test mock targets to reference cortex.* modules; expanded imports to expose PackageSnapshot and InstallationRecord from cortex.installation_history

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI as CortexCLI
    participant Resolver as DependencyResolver
    participant PrefsUI as Interactive UI
    participant PrefsMgr as PreferencesManager
    participant FileSystem as YAML Config

    User->>CLI: cortex install [packages]
    CLI->>Resolver: detect_conflicts()
    Resolver-->>CLI: conflicts found?
    
    alt Conflicts Detected
        CLI->>PrefsMgr: get saved preference
        PrefsMgr->>FileSystem: load preferences.yaml
        FileSystem-->>PrefsMgr: preferences
        PrefsMgr-->>CLI: saved_resolutions
        
        alt Saved Preference Exists
            CLI-->>User: Apply saved resolution
        else No Saved Preference
            CLI->>PrefsUI: show conflict options
            User->>PrefsUI: select keep_new/keep_existing
            PrefsUI-->>CLI: user choice
            CLI->>PrefsUI: save preference?
            User->>PrefsUI: yes
            PrefsUI->>PrefsMgr: set(saved_resolutions, ...)
            PrefsMgr->>FileSystem: save preferences.yaml
        end
    end
    
    CLI->>CLI: generate removal commands
    CLI->>CLI: execute installation
    CLI-->>User: [SUCCESS] Installation complete
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI as CortexCLI
    participant PrefsMgr as PreferencesManager
    participant YAML as YAML Config
    participant JSON as JSON Export

    User->>CLI: cortex config set [key] [value]
    CLI->>PrefsMgr: set(key, value)
    PrefsMgr->>PrefsMgr: validate value
    PrefsMgr->>YAML: update in-memory config
    PrefsMgr->>YAML: save(backup=true)
    YAML-->>PrefsMgr: config persisted
    PrefsMgr-->>CLI: success
    CLI-->>User: [SUCCESS] Config updated

    User->>CLI: cortex config export [path]
    CLI->>PrefsMgr: export_json(path)
    PrefsMgr->>JSON: write JSON file
    JSON-->>User: JSON config file

    User->>CLI: cortex config import [path]
    CLI->>PrefsMgr: import_json(path)
    PrefsMgr->>JSON: read JSON file
    PrefsMgr->>PrefsMgr: validate imported data
    PrefsMgr->>YAML: merge and save
    YAML-->>PrefsMgr: updated
    PrefsMgr-->>CLI: success
    CLI-->>User: [SUCCESS] Config imported
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes

  • cortex/user_preferences.py: New 400+ line module implementing complete configuration system with multiple dataclasses, enums, validation logic, and file I/O operations; requires careful review of YAML handling, validation rules, and backup mechanisms
  • cortex/cli.py: Substantial enhancements adding interactive conflict resolution workflow, new config command routing, DependencyResolver integration, and message formatting changes; logic density is moderate but touches multiple interaction points
  • test/test_conflict_ui.py: Comprehensive test suite with extensive mocking and integration scenarios; requires understanding of the new conflict resolution and config workflows being tested
  • Multiple test import updates: Six test files updated with sys.path manipulation and import namespace changes; while individually straightforward, requires verification that all patch targets and import paths are correctly aligned
  • File reorganization and cleanup: Multiple file moves and deletions requiring validation that references are updated and no broken imports remain

Areas requiring extra attention:

  • Validation logic in PreferencesManager (type checking, nested key access, enum/range validation)
  • Backup creation and path handling in user_preferences.py file I/O operations
  • Interactive conflict resolution flow and preference persistence edge cases in cli.py
  • Mock patch targets in test_conflict_ui.py to ensure they reference correct module paths
  • Verify all test imports reference cortex.* namespace consistently

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • dhvll

Poem

🐰 Hops with glee through organized files,
Config dances in YAML's nested styles,
Conflicts resolved with a preference so sweet,
No more tangled roots—structure's complete!
/data is tidy, the CLI's alive,
This rabbit declares: Cortex does thrive! 🌿✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 2 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Out of Scope Changes check ⚠️ Warning Significant out-of-scope changes detected: new config system (cortex/user_preferences.py, CLI config commands) and conflict resolution features are unrelated to Issue #204's file structuring objectives. Remove or isolate config management and conflict resolution features into a separate PR focused on Issue #204's file structuring requirements only.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 77.92% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The PR title 'Issue 204' is vague and generic, providing no meaningful description of what the pull request accomplishes. Replace with a descriptive title like 'Restructure project directories and update documentation' to clearly communicate the main changes.
Linked Issues check ❓ Inconclusive The PR implements key objectives from Issue #204: files are reorganized (docs moved to docs/, data files cleaned up), documentation updated (Contributing.md, Developer-Guide.md added/modified), but script file management and complete README.md updates are unclear. Clarify whether cortex_master.sh and other scripts were moved to a Scripts directory, and verify that README.md contains updated guidance for contributors and users.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description addresses most template sections but the Summary section is incomplete and contains spelling errors ('structred' instead of 'structured'). Testing details lack clarity about how structural changes were validated.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
5 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request restructures the Cortex Linux project by organizing code into a proper package structure and updating documentation. The changes address Issue #204 by moving modules into a cortex/ package directory and updating all import paths accordingly.

Key Changes

  • Reorganized project structure with modules moved to cortex/ package
  • Updated import paths in all test files from direct imports to cortex.* imports
  • Added comprehensive documentation including user guides, developer guides, bounty information, and FAQ
  • Added utility scripts for project management and automation
  • Updated .gitignore to handle data files appropriately
  • Enhanced contributing guidelines with structure requirements

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 18 out of 60 changed files in this pull request and generated 11 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
test/test_logging_system.py Updated import path to use cortex.logging_system
test/test_llm_router.py Updated import path and mock patches to use cortex.llm_router
test/test_interpreter.py NEW FILE: Added test for interpreter module (needs import path review)
test/test_installation_verifier.py Updated import path to use cortex.installation_verifier
test/test_installation_history.py Updated import path to use cortex.installation_history
test/test_error_parser.py Updated import path to use cortex.error_parser
test/test_context_memory.py Updated import path to use cortex.context_memory
test/test_conflict_ui.py NEW FILE: Comprehensive test suite for conflict resolution UI
test/init.py NEW FILE: Makes test directory a package
scripts/*.sh NEW FILES: Multiple automation scripts for project management
docs/*.md NEW FILES: Comprehensive documentation including guides, README files, and bounty information
data/contributors.json NEW FILE: Empty contributors tracking file
Contributing.md Updated with structure requirements and typos
.gitignore Updated to ignore data files except contributors.json
Developer-Guide.md REMOVED: Moved to docs/ directory
Various data files REMOVED: CSV/JSON tracking files removed from version control
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (5)

test/test_context_memory.py:24

  • Import of 'Pattern' is not used.
    Import of 'Suggestion' is not used.
    test/test_error_parser.py:16
  • Import of 'ErrorAnalysis' is not used.
    test/test_installation_history.py:20
  • Import of 'PackageSnapshot' is not used.
    Import of 'InstallationRecord' is not used.
    test/test_installation_verifier.py:16
  • Import of 'VerificationTest' is not used.
    test/test_llm_router.py:25
  • Import of 'RoutingDecision' is not used.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

4. **Claim an issue** (comment "I'll work on this")
5. **Submit your PR**
6. **Get paid** (bounties on merge)
5. **Check `develeoper-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo in the word "developer". Should be "developer-guide.md" instead of "develeoper-guide.md".

Suggested change
5. **Check `develeoper-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
5. **Check `developer-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
- [ ] Tests pass
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No merge conflicts
- [ ] maintained file structure
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo: "maintained" should be "maintaining" to match the tense of other items in the checklist.

Suggested change
- [ ] maintained file structure
- [ ] maintaining file structure

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
- ✅ Documentation with examples
- ✅ Integration with existing code
- ✅ Passes all CI checks
- ✅ Proper file managment and maintaing structure
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo: "managment and maintaing" should be "management and maintaining".

Suggested change
- ✅ Proper file managment and maintaing structure
- ✅ Proper file management and maintaining structure

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

# Should exit on choice 3
with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
result = self.cli._resolve_conflicts_interactive(conflicts)
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Variable result is not used.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

# Should exit on choice 3
with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
result = self.cli._resolve_conflicts_interactive(conflicts)
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Variable result is not used.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
import unittest
import sys
import os
from unittest.mock import patch, MagicMock, call
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Import of 'call' is not used.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
from pathlib import Path
import tempfile
import shutil
import json
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Import of 'json' is not used.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..'))

from cortex.cli import CortexCLI
from cortex.user_preferences import PreferencesManager, ConflictSettings
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Import of 'ConflictSettings' is not used.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +37 to +38
except Exception:
pass
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'except' clause does nothing but pass and there is no explanatory comment.

Suggested change
except Exception:
pass
except Exception as e:
self._print_error(f"Failed to load user preferences: {e}")

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
if not any(f"remove {pkg_to_remove}" in cmd for cmd in commands):
commands.insert(0, f"sudo apt-get remove -y {pkg_to_remove}")
self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Added command to remove conflicting package: {pkg_to_remove}")
except Exception:
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'except' clause does nothing but pass and there is no explanatory comment.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
docs/Developer-Guide.md (1)

94-94: Optional: Consider simplifying "CLI Interface" to avoid redundancy.

The phrase "CLI Interface" is technically redundant since "CLI" stands for "Command-Line Interface." Consider using either "CLI" or "Command-Line Interface" alone.

Apply this diff:

-**CLI Interface (`cortex/cli.py`)**
+**CLI (`cortex/cli.py`)**

Based on static analysis hints.

test/test_installation_history.py (1)

9-14: Consider using a proper test configuration instead of sys.path manipulation.

While this pattern works, it can be fragile and doesn't scale well. Consider using pytest with a conftest.py or installing the package in development mode (pip install -e .) to avoid manual path manipulation across all test files.

If you want to keep this approach, consider centralizing it in a conftest.py:

# test/conftest.py
import sys
import os
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..'))

Then individual test files won't need this boilerplate.

test/test_conflict_ui.py (2)

60-68: Remove unused variable assignment to satisfy linter.

The result variable is assigned but never used since SystemExit is expected.

         # Should exit on choice 3
         with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
-            result = self.cli._resolve_conflicts_interactive(conflicts)
+            self.cli._resolve_conflicts_interactive(conflicts)

362-364: Remove unused variable assignment (same pattern as above).

         # Should exit on choice 3
         with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
-            result = self.cli._resolve_conflicts_interactive(conflicts)
+            self.cli._resolve_conflicts_interactive(conflicts)
cortex/user_preferences.py (3)

122-141: from_dict silently ignores unknown keys in configuration.

If a config file contains typos or outdated keys, they will be silently ignored. Consider logging a warning for unknown keys to help users identify configuration issues.

     @classmethod
     def from_dict(cls, data: Dict[str, Any]) -> 'UserPreferences':
         """Create UserPreferences from dictionary"""
+        known_keys = {'verbosity', 'confirmations', 'auto_update', 'ai', 
+                      'packages', 'conflicts', 'theme', 'language', 'timezone'}
+        unknown_keys = set(data.keys()) - known_keys
+        if unknown_keys:
+            import logging
+            logging.warning(f"Unknown preference keys will be ignored: {unknown_keys}")
+        
         confirmations = ConfirmationSettings(**data.get("confirmations", {}))

403-405: Hardcoded model list may become stale.

The valid_models list is hardcoded and will require code changes when new models are released.

Consider making this a class constant or configuration value that can be updated more easily:

+    # At class level in PreferencesManager
+    VALID_AI_MODELS = ["claude-sonnet-4", "gpt-4", "gpt-4-turbo", "claude-3-opus"]
+    
     def validate(self) -> List[str]:
         ...
-        valid_models = ["claude-sonnet-4", "gpt-4", "gpt-4-turbo", "claude-3-opus"]
-        if self._preferences.ai.model not in valid_models:
+        if self._preferences.ai.model not in self.VALID_AI_MODELS:
             errors.append(f"Unknown AI model: {self._preferences.ai.model}")

Alternatively, consider making validation a warning rather than an error for the model field to allow new models without code changes.


283-354: The set() method has high cognitive complexity.

SonarCloud reports complexity of 42 vs allowed 15. Consider refactoring into smaller handler methods per preference domain.

Example approach using a handler dispatch pattern:

def set(self, key: str, value: Any) -> bool:
    if self._preferences is None:
        self.load()
    
    parts = key.split(".")
    handlers = {
        "verbosity": self._set_verbosity,
        "confirmations": self._set_confirmations,
        "auto_update": self._set_auto_update,
        "ai": self._set_ai,
        "packages": self._set_packages,
        "conflicts": self._set_conflicts,
    }
    
    handler = handlers.get(parts[0])
    if handler:
        return handler(parts, value)
    elif parts[0] in ["theme", "language", "timezone"]:
        setattr(self._preferences, parts[0], value)
        return True
    else:
        raise ValueError(f"Unknown preference key: {key}")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between deea55d and ce9938c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • bounties_owed.csv is excluded by !**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • Contributing.md (3 hunks)
  • Developer-Guide.md (0 hunks)
  • bounties_pending.json (0 hunks)
  • cortex/cli.py (13 hunks)
  • cortex/user_preferences.py (1 hunks)
  • docs/Developer-Guide.md (1 hunks)
  • issue_status.json (0 hunks)
  • payments_history.json (0 hunks)
  • pr_status.json (0 hunks)
  • test/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • test/test_conflict_ui.py (1 hunks)
  • test/test_context_memory.py (1 hunks)
  • test/test_error_parser.py (1 hunks)
  • test/test_installation_history.py (1 hunks)
  • test/test_installation_verifier.py (1 hunks)
  • test/test_llm_router.py (10 hunks)
  • test/test_logging_system.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
  • bounties_pending.json
  • issue_status.json
  • payments_history.json
  • Developer-Guide.md
  • pr_status.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
cortex/cli.py (3)
cortex/installation_history.py (1)
  • InstallationHistory (68-653)
cortex/user_preferences.py (10)
  • PreferencesManager (144-488)
  • load (200-225)
  • get (258-281)
  • save (227-256)
  • list_all (478-488)
  • get_config_info (458-476)
  • reset (356-383)
  • validate (385-416)
  • export_json (418-434)
  • import_json (436-456)
cortex/dependency_resolver.py (2)
  • DependencyResolver (39-399)
  • resolve_dependencies (215-280)
test/test_logging_system.py (1)
cortex/logging_system.py (2)
  • CortexLogger (90-453)
  • LogContext (456-475)
cortex/user_preferences.py (1)
cortex/logging_system.py (1)
  • info (211-213)
test/test_conflict_ui.py (3)
cortex/cli.py (3)
  • _resolve_conflicts_interactive (73-123)
  • _ask_save_preference (125-141)
  • config (369-482)
cortex/user_preferences.py (9)
  • PreferencesManager (144-488)
  • ConflictSettings (86-92)
  • get (258-281)
  • save (227-256)
  • load (200-225)
  • reset (356-383)
  • validate (385-416)
  • export_json (418-434)
  • import_json (436-456)
cortex/dependency_resolver.py (2)
  • DependencyResolver (39-399)
  • resolve_dependencies (215-280)
🪛 GitHub Check: SonarCloud Code Analysis
cortex/user_preferences.py

[failure] 283-283: Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 42 to the 15 allowed.

See more on https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=cortexlinux_cortex&issues=AZq7zerIwigPo6fBto1V&open=AZq7zerIwigPo6fBto1V&pullRequest=205

🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Developer-Guide.md

[style] ~94-~94: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘Interface’). Use simply “CLIInterface”.
Context: ...ns patterns) ``` ### Key Components CLI Interface (cortex/cli.py) - Command-line inte...

(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
Contributing.md

76-76: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)
cortex/cli.py

37-38: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


37-37: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


188-189: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


188-188: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


480-480: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


481-481: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)

cortex/user_preferences.py

1-1: Shebang is present but file is not executable

(EXE001)


196-196: Consider moving this statement to an else block

(TRY300)


197-197: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


198-198: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


198-198: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


198-198: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)


220-220: Consider moving this statement to an else block

(TRY300)


223-223: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


223-223: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


223-223: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)


224-224: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


225-225: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


225-225: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


225-225: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)


238-238: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


253-253: Consider moving this statement to an else block

(TRY300)


255-255: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


256-256: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


256-256: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


256-256: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)


302-302: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


302-302: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


307-307: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


307-307: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


309-309: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


309-309: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


314-314: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


314-314: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


316-316: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


316-316: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


318-318: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


318-318: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


323-323: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


323-323: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


326-326: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


326-326: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


328-328: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


328-328: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


333-333: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


333-333: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


335-335: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


335-335: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


340-340: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


340-340: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


342-342: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


342-342: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


349-349: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)


349-349: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


351-351: Consider moving this statement to an else block

(TRY300)


354-354: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


354-354: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


354-354: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)


379-379: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


453-453: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)

test/test_conflict_ui.py

62-62: Local variable result is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable result

(F841)


270-270: Unused method argument: mock_stdout

(ARG002)


284-284: Unused method argument: mock_stdout

(ARG002)


284-284: Unused method argument: mock_input

(ARG002)


364-364: Local variable result is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable result

(F841)

🔇 Additional comments (16)
.gitignore (1)

154-160: LGTM!

The Cortex-specific ignore rules are well structured. The negation pattern correctly excludes data/contributors.json from being ignored while filtering other JSON and CSV files in the data directory.

test/__init__.py (1)

1-1: LGTM!

The test package initializer is appropriate for establishing the test namespace. This enables proper import resolution for test modules.

test/test_logging_system.py (1)

11-12: LGTM!

The import path update correctly references the cortex package namespace, aligning with the project restructuring. The sys.path manipulation properly enables module resolution.

test/test_context_memory.py (1)

17-24: LGTM!

The import path update correctly migrates to the cortex package namespace, maintaining all required exports (ContextMemory, MemoryEntry, Pattern, Suggestion). This aligns with the broader repository restructuring.

test/test_installation_verifier.py (1)

7-16: LGTM!

The import path updates are consistent with the project-wide restructuring. The sys.path manipulation and cortex.installation_verifier import correctly enable module resolution under the new package structure.

test/test_error_parser.py (1)

7-16: LGTM!

The import updates follow the established pattern across the test suite, correctly referencing cortex.error_parser with proper path resolution.

test/test_llm_router.py (2)

16-25: LGTM!

The import path updates correctly migrate to the cortex.llm_router namespace, maintaining all required exports. The sys.path manipulation properly enables module resolution.


247-247: Critical patch target updates are correct.

All @patch decorator targets have been correctly updated to reference cortex.llm_router.* instead of llm_router.*. This is essential for the mocking to work properly with the new package structure.

Also applies to: 279-279, 316-316, 351-351, 383-383, 425-426, 460-461, 502-502, 522-522

docs/Developer-Guide.md (1)

1-184: Excellent developer documentation.

The guide comprehensively documents the restructured project layout, development workflow, architecture, and contribution process. This will be valuable for new contributors understanding the codebase organization.

test/test_conflict_ui.py (2)

269-280: Unused mock_stdout parameter is acceptable here.

The @patch('sys.stdout') decorator is required to suppress output during test execution, even though the captured output isn't explicitly inspected. The Ruff ARG002 warning can be safely ignored in this context.


32-48: Good test fixture setup with proper cleanup.

The use of tempfile.mkdtemp() and shutil.rmtree() ensures test isolation and proper resource cleanup.

cortex/cli.py (3)

73-123: Conflict resolution logic looks correct and user-friendly.

The interactive flow with saved preferences lookup, clear menu options, and the option to persist choices is well-designed. The min:max key format ensures consistent conflict identification regardless of input order.


176-176: Package name extraction may be too simplistic.

Using software.split()[0] to get the target package may not work correctly for quoted or multi-word package names like "python 3.11 with pip".

Consider extracting the actual package name more robustly, or document that the first word is used as the primary package for conflict detection.


369-482: Config method implementation is comprehensive.

The method properly handles all documented actions (list, get, set, reset, validate, info, export, import) with appropriate error handling and user feedback.

cortex/user_preferences.py (2)

36-93: Well-structured dataclasses for preferences.

The use of nested dataclasses with to_dict() methods provides clean serialization. The default values are sensible.


180-198: Backup creation before save is a good safety feature.

The timestamped backup approach ensures users can recover from bad configuration changes.

4. **Claim an issue** (comment "I'll work on this")
5. **Submit your PR**
6. **Get paid** (bounties on merge)
5. **Check `develeoper-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Typo: "develeoper-guide.md" should be "developer-guide.md".

-5. **Check `develeoper-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
+5. **Check `developer-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
5. **Check `develeoper-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
5. **Check `developer-guide.md`** (in `docs` directory) for structure and guide
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Contributing.md around line 13, there is a typo in the filename reference:
"develeoper-guide.md" should be corrected to "developer-guide.md"; update the
text to the correct filename and ensure any links or references to that file
elsewhere in the document use the corrected spelling.

- ✅ Documentation with examples
- ✅ Integration with existing code
- ✅ Passes all CI checks
- ✅ Proper file managment and maintaing structure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Typos: "managment" → "management", "maintaing" → "maintaining".

-- ✅ Proper file managment and maintaing structure
++ ✅ Proper file management and maintaining structure
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- ✅ Proper file managment and maintaing structure
- ✅ Proper file management and maintaining structure
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Contributing.md around line 59, there are two typos: replace "managment" with
"management" and "maintaing" with "maintaining" so the line reads "✅ Proper file
management and maintaining structure"; update the file accordingly and run a
quick spellcheck to catch any other similar typos.

- [ ] Tests pass
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No merge conflicts
- [ ] maintained file structure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Typo: "maintained" should be capitalized consistently with other checklist items.

-- [ ] maintained file structure
++ [ ] Maintained file structure
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

76-76: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Contributing.md around line 76, the checklist item "- [ ] maintained file
structure" uses a lowercase "maintained" which is inconsistent with other
checklist items; update that line to capitalize the word (e.g., "- [ ]
Maintained file structure") so it matches the capitalization style used
throughout the checklist.

Comment on lines +35 to +38
try:
self.prefs_manager.load()
except Exception:
pass
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Silent exception swallowing hides initialization failures.

Catching all exceptions and passing silently makes debugging difficult. Consider logging the error or at minimum, handling specific expected exceptions.

         self.prefs_manager = PreferencesManager()
         try:
             self.prefs_manager.load()
-        except Exception:
-            pass
+        except (IOError, ValueError) as e:
+            # Preferences will use defaults; log for debugging
+            import logging
+            logging.debug(f"Failed to load preferences, using defaults: {e}")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
try:
self.prefs_manager.load()
except Exception:
pass
self.prefs_manager = PreferencesManager()
try:
self.prefs_manager.load()
except (IOError, ValueError) as e:
# Preferences will use defaults; log for debugging
import logging
logging.debug(f"Failed to load preferences, using defaults: {e}")
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)

37-38: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


37-37: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cortex/cli.py around lines 35 to 38 the code swallows all exceptions when
loading preferences which hides initialization failures; replace the bare except
with targeted handling and logging: catch expected exceptions (e.g.,
FileNotFoundError, JSONDecodeError) and handle them appropriately, and for
unexpected errors catch Exception as e and call the module logger to log the
exception (logger.exception or logger.error with the exception) instead of
passing silently; optionally re-raise or surface fatal errors after logging if
initialization cannot continue.

Comment on lines +172 to +189
# Check for package conflicts using DependencyResolver
from cortex.dependency_resolver import DependencyResolver
resolver = DependencyResolver()

target_package = software.split()[0]

try:
graph = resolver.resolve_dependencies(target_package)
if graph.conflicts:
resolutions = self._resolve_conflicts_interactive(graph.conflicts)

if resolutions['remove']:
for pkg_to_remove in resolutions['remove']:
if not any(f"remove {pkg_to_remove}" in cmd for cmd in commands):
commands.insert(0, f"sudo apt-get remove -y {pkg_to_remove}")
self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Added command to remove conflicting package: {pkg_to_remove}")
except Exception:
pass
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Silent exception handling masks dependency resolution failures.

When dependency resolution fails, users won't know why conflicts weren't detected. At minimum, log the failure in debug mode.

             try:
                 graph = resolver.resolve_dependencies(target_package)
                 if graph.conflicts:
                     resolutions = self._resolve_conflicts_interactive(graph.conflicts)
                     
                     if resolutions['remove']:
                         for pkg_to_remove in resolutions['remove']:
                             if not any(f"remove {pkg_to_remove}" in cmd for cmd in commands):
                                 commands.insert(0, f"sudo apt-get remove -y {pkg_to_remove}")
                                 self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Added command to remove conflicting package: {pkg_to_remove}")
-            except Exception:
-                pass
+            except Exception as e:
+                # Dependency resolution is best-effort; continue without conflict detection
+                self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Could not check for conflicts: {e}")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Check for package conflicts using DependencyResolver
from cortex.dependency_resolver import DependencyResolver
resolver = DependencyResolver()
target_package = software.split()[0]
try:
graph = resolver.resolve_dependencies(target_package)
if graph.conflicts:
resolutions = self._resolve_conflicts_interactive(graph.conflicts)
if resolutions['remove']:
for pkg_to_remove in resolutions['remove']:
if not any(f"remove {pkg_to_remove}" in cmd for cmd in commands):
commands.insert(0, f"sudo apt-get remove -y {pkg_to_remove}")
self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Added command to remove conflicting package: {pkg_to_remove}")
except Exception:
pass
# Check for package conflicts using DependencyResolver
from cortex.dependency_resolver import DependencyResolver
resolver = DependencyResolver()
target_package = software.split()[0]
try:
graph = resolver.resolve_dependencies(target_package)
if graph.conflicts:
resolutions = self._resolve_conflicts_interactive(graph.conflicts)
if resolutions['remove']:
for pkg_to_remove in resolutions['remove']:
if not any(f"remove {pkg_to_remove}" in cmd for cmd in commands):
commands.insert(0, f"sudo apt-get remove -y {pkg_to_remove}")
self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Added command to remove conflicting package: {pkg_to_remove}")
except Exception as e:
# Dependency resolution is best-effort; continue without conflict detection
self._print_status("[INFO]", f"Could not check for conflicts: {e}")
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)

188-189: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


188-188: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cortex/cli.py around lines 172 to 189 the except block swallows all errors
from dependency resolution; change it to catch Exception as e and log the
failure with the exception details at debug level (e.g.,
logging.getLogger(__name__).debug("Dependency resolution failed for %s: %s",
target_package, e, exc_info=True) or use the existing class logger if available)
then preserve the existing non-fatal behavior (do not re-raise) so users and
debuggers can see why resolution failed.

Comment on lines +494 to +497
if value.lower() in ('true', 'yes', 'on', '1'):
return True
if value.lower() in ('false', 'no', 'off', '0'):
return False
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Parsing '0' and '1' as booleans may cause unexpected behavior.

The string '1' is parsed as True and '0' as False, which could be problematic when users intend to set an integer value. Consider requiring explicit boolean keywords only.

-        if value.lower() in ('true', 'yes', 'on', '1'):
+        if value.lower() in ('true', 'yes', 'on'):
             return True
-        if value.lower() in ('false', 'no', 'off', '0'):
+        if value.lower() in ('false', 'no', 'off'):
             return False

This ensures cortex config set some.int.value 1 sets an integer, not a boolean.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if value.lower() in ('true', 'yes', 'on', '1'):
return True
if value.lower() in ('false', 'no', 'off', '0'):
return False
if value.lower() in ('true', 'yes', 'on'):
return True
if value.lower() in ('false', 'no', 'off'):
return False
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cortex/cli.py around lines 494 to 497, the boolean parsing currently treats
'1' and '0' as True/False which can misinterpret numeric inputs; change the
checks to only accept explicit boolean words (e.g., 'true', 'yes', 'on' => True
and 'false', 'no', 'off' => False) and remove '1' and '0' from those tuples so
numeric strings fall through to integer/other parsing; update or add unit tests
to assert that "1" and "0" are not converted to booleans and that explicit
boolean words still parse correctly.

Comment on lines +197 to +198
except Exception as e:
raise IOError(f"Failed to create backup: {str(e)}")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major

Use exception chaining for better debugging context.

When re-raising exceptions, use raise ... from e to preserve the original traceback.

         except Exception as e:
-            raise IOError(f"Failed to create backup: {str(e)}")
+            raise IOError(f"Failed to create backup: {e}") from e

Apply the same pattern to lines 223, 225, 256, and 354.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.14.5)

197-197: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


198-198: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)


198-198: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)


198-198: Use explicit conversion flag

Replace with conversion flag

(RUF010)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cortex/user_preferences.py around lines 197-198 (and also apply to lines 223,
225, 256, and 354), the code re-raises new exceptions without chaining the
original exception; update each raise to use "raise ... from e" (for example,
raise IOError(f"...: {e}") from e) so the original traceback is preserved and
include the original error message in the new exception text for clearer
context.

@dhvll dhvll closed this Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

File structuring and management.

2 participants