feat: Add system health monitoring module (#128) #292
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@hyaku0121 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughAdds a health monitoring subsystem with four system checks (disk, performance, security, updates), a HealthMonitor orchestrator that aggregates weighted scores and persists history, CLI integration via a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor User
participant CLI as CortexCLI
participant Monitor as HealthMonitor
participant Checks as HealthChecks
participant System as OS/Commands/Files
participant History as History File
User->>CLI: run `cortex health`
CLI->>Monitor: instantiate & register checks
CLI->>Monitor: run_all()
loop per-check (iterative)
Monitor->>Checks: <check>.run()
Checks->>System: perform system queries (systemctl, files, apt, disk_usage, getloadavg)
System-->>Checks: outputs / exceptions
Checks-->>Monitor: CheckResult (or error handled)
end
Monitor->>Monitor: aggregate weighted scores, build report
Monitor->>History: _save_history(report)
History-->>Monitor: write JSON (trim to last 100)
Monitor-->>CLI: report dict
CLI-->>User: formatted health output
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60–90 minutes
Possibly related issues
Suggested labels
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
cortex/health/checks/updates.py (3)
4-5: Add docstrings for public class and method.As per coding guidelines, docstrings are required for all public APIs. The
UpdateCheckclass andrunmethod lack documentation.class UpdateCheck(HealthCheck): + """Check for pending system updates and security patches.""" + def run(self) -> CheckResult: + """ + Run the update check by querying apt for upgradable packages. + + Returns: + CheckResult with score based on pending updates count. + """ score = 100
37-38: Avoid silently swallowing exceptions.The bare
except Exception: passhides potential issues like subprocess failures or parsing errors. Consider logging the error or returning a result that indicates the check could not complete reliably.- except Exception: - pass # Ignore errors + except Exception as e: + # Log or handle gracefully; return indeterminate result + return CheckResult( + name="System Updates", + category="updates", + score=100, + status="SKIP", + details=f"Check failed: {e}", + weight=0.30 + )
14-17: Add timeout to subprocess.run to prevent hangs.If
apthangs (e.g., waiting for a lock), the health check will block indefinitely. Consider adding a timeout.res = subprocess.run( ["apt", "list", "--upgradable"], - capture_output=True, text=True + capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30 )scripts/verify_ubuntu_compatibility.py (4)
8-9: Use absolute path for history file.
HISTORY_FILEis a relative path, so the JSON file will be written to whatever directory the script is run from. Consider storing it in a predictable location like the user's home directory.+import pathlib + # File name to store history data -HISTORY_FILE = "security_history.json" +HISTORY_FILE = pathlib.Path.home() / ".cortex" / "security_history.json"You'll also need to ensure the directory exists before writing:
HISTORY_FILE.parent.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
62-62: Remove unnecessary f-string.This f-string has no placeholders. Use a regular string instead.
else: - print(f" Trend: ➡️ Stable") + print(" Trend: ➡️ Stable")
138-239: Refactorverify_security_logicto reduce cognitive complexity.Static analysis reports cognitive complexity of 33 (limit is 15). Extract the firewall check and SSH check logic into separate helper functions to improve readability and maintainability.
def _check_firewall() -> tuple[bool, bool]: """Check UFW status. Returns (is_active, needs_fix).""" print("\n[1] Checking Firewall (UFW)...") try: print(" Running: systemctl is-active ufw") res = subprocess.run( ["systemctl", "is-active", "ufw"], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=10 ) output = res.stdout.strip() print(f" Output: '{output}'") if res.returncode == 0 and output == "active": print(" -> JUDGEMENT: Firewall is ACTIVE (Score: 100)") return True, False else: print(" -> JUDGEMENT: Firewall is INACTIVE (Score: 0)") return False, True except FileNotFoundError: print(" -> ERROR: 'systemctl' command not found.") return False, False except Exception as e: print(f" -> ERROR: {e}") return False, False def _check_ssh_config(ssh_config: str) -> tuple[int, bool]: """Check SSH config. Returns (score_penalty, needs_fix).""" # ... extracted logicThen call these from
verify_security_logic().
75-82: Add timeout to subprocess calls.The
subprocess.runcall for enabling UFW could hang. Add a timeout parameter.try: # Depends on execution environment, sudo might be required - subprocess.run(["sudo", "ufw", "enable"], check=True) + subprocess.run(["sudo", "ufw", "enable"], check=True, timeout=30) print(" -> ✅ Success: Firewall enabled.") return True - except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: + except (subprocess.CalledProcessError, subprocess.TimeoutExpired) as e: print(f" -> ❌ Failed to enable firewall: {e}") return Falsecortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
4-6: Add docstrings and use_for unused variable.Per coding guidelines, docstrings are required for public APIs. Also, rename
freeto_since it's unused.class DiskCheck(HealthCheck): + """Check disk space usage on root filesystem.""" + def run(self) -> CheckResult: - total, used, free = shutil.disk_usage("/") + """ + Check disk usage percentage and return health score. + + Returns: + CheckResult with score based on disk usage thresholds. + """ + total, used, _ = shutil.disk_usage("/")cortex/cli.py (1)
177-181: Consider wrapping HealthMonitor in try-except.If any health check raises an unexpected exception, it could crash the CLI. While
HealthMonitor.run_allhas internal exception handling, wrapping the call adds defense-in-depth.from cortex.health.monitor import HealthMonitor self._print_status("🔍", "Running system health checks...") - monitor = HealthMonitor() - report = monitor.run_all() + try: + monitor = HealthMonitor() + report = monitor.run_all() + except Exception as e: + self._print_error(f"Health check failed: {e}") + return 1cortex/health/checks/security.py (3)
5-6: Add docstrings for public class and method.Per coding guidelines, docstrings are required for all public APIs.
class SecurityCheck(HealthCheck): + """Check security configuration including firewall and SSH settings.""" + def run(self) -> CheckResult: + """ + Run security checks for firewall status and SSH configuration. + + Returns: + CheckResult with security score based on detected issues. + """ score = 100
14-17: Add timeout to subprocess.run.The subprocess call could hang if systemctl is unresponsive.
res = subprocess.run( ["systemctl", "is-active", "ufw"], - capture_output=True, text=True + capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=10 )You'll also need to handle
subprocess.TimeoutExpired:- except FileNotFoundError: + except (FileNotFoundError, subprocess.TimeoutExpired): pass # Environment without systemctl (e.g., Docker or non-systemd)
11-27: Consider extracting firewall check to reduce complexity.Static analysis reports cognitive complexity of 16 (limit 15). While only marginally over, extracting the firewall check into a helper method would improve readability and make future security checks easier to add.
def _check_firewall(self) -> tuple[bool, str, str]: """Check if UFW firewall is active. Returns: Tuple of (is_active, issue_text, recommendation_text) """ try: res = subprocess.run( ["systemctl", "is-active", "ufw"], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=10 ) if res.returncode == 0 and res.stdout.strip() == "active": return True, None, None except (FileNotFoundError, subprocess.TimeoutExpired): pass return False, "Firewall Inactive", "Enable UFW Firewall"tests/test_health_monitor.py (3)
32-60: Consider adding a test for the high-memory penalty path in PerformanceCheckYou cover the “no penalty” and “high load” scenarios, but never drive the
used_percent > 80branch. A small additional test would lock in behaviour for memory pressure and guard future changes, e.g. using a lowMemAvailableto assert a reduced score and"High Memory"indetails.
61-84: Optionally add coverage for SSH root-login penalty in SecurityCheckCurrent tests validate UFW inactive/active flows but not the
PermitRootLogin yescase that should subtract 50 points and add a"Root SSH Allowed"issue. A focused test that patchesos.path.existsandopenforsshd_configwould tighten coverage on a security-sensitive branch.
110-135: HealthMonitor aggregation test is solid; you could also assert status/details if desiredThe weighted-average calculation and result-count assertions verify the core aggregation logic and history-skipping behaviour. As a small enhancement, you could also assert that the per-check entries in
report["results"]preserve the inputname/categoryand thattotal_scoreis anint.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
cortex/cli.py(9 hunks)cortex/health/checks/disk.py(1 hunks)cortex/health/checks/performance.py(1 hunks)cortex/health/checks/security.py(1 hunks)cortex/health/checks/updates.py(1 hunks)cortex/health/monitor.py(1 hunks)scripts/verify_ubuntu_compatibility.py(1 hunks)tests/test_health_monitor.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs
Files:
cortex/health/checks/disk.pyscripts/verify_ubuntu_compatibility.pytests/test_health_monitor.pycortex/cli.pycortex/health/monitor.pycortex/health/checks/performance.pycortex/health/checks/security.pycortex/health/checks/updates.py
tests/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Maintain >80% test coverage for pull requests
Files:
tests/test_health_monitor.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (6)
cortex/health/checks/disk.py (3)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)cortex/health/checks/performance.py (1)
run(6-63)cortex/health/checks/updates.py (1)
run(5-56)
cortex/cli.py (2)
cortex/first_run_wizard.py (1)
save_config(146-152)cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthMonitor(28-102)run_all(52-87)
cortex/health/monitor.py (4)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (1)
SecurityCheck(5-57)cortex/health/checks/updates.py (1)
UpdateCheck(4-56)cortex/health/checks/performance.py (1)
PerformanceCheck(5-63)cortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
DiskCheck(4-33)
cortex/health/checks/performance.py (2)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)cortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
run(5-33)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (3)
cortex/health/monitor.py (1)
CheckResult(12-20)cortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
run(5-33)cortex/health/checks/updates.py (1)
run(5-56)
cortex/health/checks/updates.py (1)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)
🪛 GitHub Check: SonarCloud Code Analysis
cortex/health/checks/disk.py
[warning] 6-6: Replace the unused local variable "free" with "_".
[warning] 20-20: Fix this condition that always evaluates to false.
scripts/verify_ubuntu_compatibility.py
[warning] 62-62: Add replacement fields or use a normal string instead of an f-string.
[failure] 138-138: Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 33 to the 15 allowed.
tests/test_health_monitor.py
[warning] 59-59: Remove this commented out code.
cortex/cli.py
[warning] 175-175: Remove the unused function parameter "args".
[warning] 666-666: Remove the unused local variable "health_parser".
cortex/health/checks/security.py
[failure] 6-6: Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 16 to the 15 allowed.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
cortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
15-24: LGTM!The threshold-based scoring logic is clear and correctly implements the specification. The static analysis warning about line 20 being always false is a false positive—the
elifbranch is correctly reachable when80 < usage_percent <= 90.cortex/cli.py (2)
174-222: LGTM! Health command is well-structured.The health command implementation is clean:
- Proper integration with
HealthMonitor- Good visual formatting with color-coded scores
- Clear display of factors and recommendations
The unused
argsparameter (flagged by static analysis) is acceptable for consistency with other CLI command method signatures, allowing future extension without signature changes.
664-667: Unusedhealth_parservariable is acceptable.Static analysis flags this as unused, but the pattern matches other subparsers (e.g.,
demo_parser,status_parser). This is fine—keeping the variable allows future addition of arguments to the health command without restructuring.cortex/health/checks/security.py (1)
36-41: LGTM on SSH check logic.Good use of
"yes" in line.split()to avoid matching commented lines like#PermitRootLogin yesand to ensure exact word match rather than substring.tests/test_health_monitor.py (2)
9-31: DiskCheck tests correctly exercise all threshold branchesThe three scenarios (50%, 85%, 95% usage) map cleanly to OK/WARNING/CRITICAL and validate both score and status; mocking of
disk_usageis scoped and appropriate.
85-109: UpdateCheck scoring test matches implementation and is robustThe constructed
apt list --upgradableoutput and the expected84score align with the production scoring formula, and asserting"3 pending"indetailsensures basic messaging is correct.
| class PerformanceCheck(HealthCheck): | ||
| def run(self) -> CheckResult: | ||
| score = 100 | ||
| issues = [] | ||
| rec = None | ||
|
|
||
| # 1. Load Average (1min) | ||
| try: | ||
| load1, _, _ = os.getloadavg() | ||
| cores = multiprocessing.cpu_count() | ||
| # Load ratio against core count | ||
| load_ratio = load1 / cores | ||
|
|
||
| if load_ratio > 1.0: | ||
| score -= 50 | ||
| issues.append(f"High Load ({load1:.2f})") | ||
| rec = "Check top processes" | ||
| except Exception: | ||
| pass # Skip on Windows etc. | ||
|
|
||
| # 2. Memory Usage (Linux /proc/meminfo) | ||
| try: | ||
| with open('/proc/meminfo', 'r') as f: | ||
| meminfo = {} | ||
| for line in f: | ||
| parts = line.split(':') | ||
| if len(parts) == 2: | ||
| meminfo[parts[0].strip()] = int(parts[1].strip().split()[0]) | ||
|
|
||
| if 'MemTotal' in meminfo and 'MemAvailable' in meminfo: | ||
| total = meminfo['MemTotal'] | ||
| avail = meminfo['MemAvailable'] | ||
| used_percent = ((total - avail) / total) * 100 | ||
|
|
||
| if used_percent > 80: | ||
| penalty = int(used_percent - 80) | ||
| score -= penalty | ||
| issues.append(f"High Memory ({used_percent:.0f}%)") | ||
| except FileNotFoundError: | ||
| pass # Non-Linux systems | ||
|
|
||
| # Summary of results | ||
| status = "OK" | ||
| if score < 50: | ||
| status = "CRITICAL" | ||
| elif score < 90: | ||
| status = "WARNING" | ||
|
|
||
| details = ", ".join(issues) if issues else "Optimal" | ||
|
|
||
| return CheckResult( | ||
| name="System Load", | ||
| category="performance", | ||
| score=max(0, score), | ||
| status=status, | ||
| details=details, | ||
| recommendation=rec, | ||
| weight=0.20 # 20% | ||
| ) No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Add docstrings for PerformanceCheck and run to meet public-API guideline
PerformanceCheck is part of the public health-check surface but currently lacks docstrings. Adding brief class and method docstrings will align with the “docstrings required for all public APIs” guideline and clarify what this check measures.
-class PerformanceCheck(HealthCheck):
- def run(self) -> CheckResult:
+class PerformanceCheck(HealthCheck):
+ """Health check for basic system performance (CPU load and memory usage)."""
+
+ def run(self) -> CheckResult:
+ """Compute a 0–100 performance score from load average and memory pressure."""
score = 100
issues = []
rec = None🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cortex/health/checks/performance.py around lines 5 to 63, the public class
PerformanceCheck and its run method lack docstrings; add a one- to two-line
class docstring describing that PerformanceCheck evaluates system performance
(load and memory) and its intended use in health checks, and add a short method
docstring for run describing what it measures, the return type (CheckResult),
and any important behavior (e.g., skipped checks on non-Linux/Windows handling);
keep both concise, present-tense, and follow the repository’s docstring style
(brief summary + returns note).
| with open(config_path, 'w') as f: | ||
| f.writelines(new_lines) | ||
| print(" -> ✅ Success: sshd_config updated.") | ||
|
|
||
| # Attempt to restart SSH service | ||
| print(" -> Restarting sshd service...") | ||
| subprocess.run(["sudo", "systemctl", "restart", "ssh"], check=False) | ||
| return True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SSH restart may fail silently and leave config in inconsistent state.
If SSH restart fails (check=False), the user isn't clearly warned that the service may need manual restart. Also consider that if write succeeds but restart fails, the system could be in a partially-updated state.
# Attempt to restart SSH service
print(" -> Restarting sshd service...")
- subprocess.run(["sudo", "systemctl", "restart", "ssh"], check=False)
+ result = subprocess.run(
+ ["sudo", "systemctl", "restart", "ssh"],
+ capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30
+ )
+ if result.returncode != 0:
+ print(" -> ⚠️ SSH service restart failed. Please restart manually.")
return True📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| with open(config_path, 'w') as f: | |
| f.writelines(new_lines) | |
| print(" -> ✅ Success: sshd_config updated.") | |
| # Attempt to restart SSH service | |
| print(" -> Restarting sshd service...") | |
| subprocess.run(["sudo", "systemctl", "restart", "ssh"], check=False) | |
| return True | |
| with open(config_path, 'w') as f: | |
| f.writelines(new_lines) | |
| print(" -> ✅ Success: sshd_config updated.") | |
| # Attempt to restart SSH service | |
| print(" -> Restarting sshd service...") | |
| result = subprocess.run( | |
| ["sudo", "systemctl", "restart", "ssh"], | |
| capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30 | |
| ) | |
| if result.returncode != 0: | |
| print(" -> ⚠️ SSH service restart failed. Please restart manually.") | |
| return True |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/verify_ubuntu_compatibility.py around lines 119 to 126, the script
currently restarts sshd with subprocess.run(..., check=False) which can fail
silently after writing the new sshd_config; change this to explicitly check the
restart result, create a backup of the original config before writing, attempt
the restart and if it fails restore the backup, print a clear error/warning
instructing manual intervention (or exit non-zero), and ensure you only return
True after a successful restart so the user is not misled.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (3)
11-34: Firewall check implementation is solid.The timeout, exact string match, and error handling for missing systemctl environments are well thought out. The scoring logic correctly sets score to 0 when the firewall is inactive per requirements.
Consider logging or narrowing the generic
except Exceptionblock (lines 28-29) to avoid silently suppressing unexpected errors, though the current approach prioritizes graceful degradation.
36-52: SSH root login check works but could be more precise.The current logic on line 44 checks if
"yes"appears anywhere in the split line. While this works for most well-formed configs, consider verifying that"yes"immediately followsPermitRootLogin:- if line.startswith("PermitRootLogin") and "yes" in line.split(): + parts = line.split() + if len(parts) >= 2 and parts[0] == "PermitRootLogin" and parts[1] == "yes": score -= 50This prevents false positives from malformed lines like
PermitRootLogin no yes # comment.
6-66: Consider extracting helper methods to reduce cognitive complexity.SonarCloud flagged this method with a cognitive complexity of 19 (threshold: 15). Extracting the firewall check (lines 11-34) and SSH check (lines 36-52) into separate helper methods would improve readability and maintainability:
def _check_firewall(self) -> tuple[int, list[str], list[str]]: """Check UFW firewall status.""" # Lines 11-34 logic here # Return (score_delta, issues, recommendations) ... def _check_ssh_root_login(self) -> tuple[int, list[str], list[str]]: """Check SSH root login configuration.""" # Lines 36-52 logic here # Return (score_delta, issues, recommendations) ... def run(self) -> CheckResult: """Execute security checks and return aggregated results.""" score = 100 issues = [] recommendations = [] fw_score, fw_issues, fw_recs = self._check_firewall() score += fw_score # or score = fw_score if firewall sets absolute value issues.extend(fw_issues) recommendations.extend(fw_recs) ssh_score, ssh_issues, ssh_recs = self._check_ssh_root_login() score += ssh_score issues.extend(ssh_issues) recommendations.extend(ssh_recs) # Status determination and return...This refactor would also make the logic easier to unit test.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cortex/health/checks/security.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs
Files:
cortex/health/checks/security.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (1)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)
🪛 GitHub Check: SonarCloud Code Analysis
cortex/health/checks/security.py
[failure] 6-6: Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 19 to the 15 allowed.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (3)
1-3: Imports look good.The imports are appropriate for the functionality implemented.
54-56: Status derivation logic is correct.The three-tier status mapping (OK, WARNING, CRITICAL) correctly reflects the score thresholds.
58-66: CheckResult construction looks correct.The score clamping with
max(0, score)properly handles negative scores, and the conditional logic for details and recommendations is sound.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
7-38: Disk check logic looks solid; consider adding error handling and confirm threshold boundariesThe implementation and scoring bands are clear and consistent;
DiskCheck.rundoes what it claims. The main gap is robustness ifshutil.disk_usage("/")were ever to raise (e.g., unexpected environment or permissions issue). Right now that would bubble up and potentially break the whole health run, unlikeupdates.run, which already guards its external interaction.You could make the check more defensive by wrapping the disk usage call and returning a
CRITICALresult on failure, for example:- # Use _ for unused variable (free space) - total, used, _ = shutil.disk_usage("/") - usage_percent = (used / total) * 100 - + # Use _ for unused variable (free space) + try: + total, used, _ = shutil.disk_usage("/") + usage_percent = (used / total) * 100 + except OSError as exc: + return CheckResult( + name="Disk Usage", + category="disk", + score=0, + status="CRITICAL", + details=f"Failed to read disk usage: {exc}", + recommendation="Check disk configuration and permissions", + weight=0.20, + ) + score = 100 status = "OK" rec = NoneAlso, please double‑check that the boundary behavior is what you want: with
> 90/> 80, exactly 90% usage is treated asWARNINGand exactly 80% asOK. If you intended 90% to be critical and 80% to be warning, switching to>=would make that explicit.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
cortex/health/checks/disk.py(1 hunks)cortex/health/checks/security.py(1 hunks)cortex/health/checks/updates.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs
Files:
cortex/health/checks/disk.pycortex/health/checks/updates.pycortex/health/checks/security.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
cortex/health/checks/disk.py (2)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)cortex/health/checks/updates.py (1)
run(7-59)
cortex/health/checks/updates.py (4)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)cortex/health/checks/disk.py (1)
run(7-39)cortex/health/checks/security.py (1)
run(8-45)cortex/health/checks/performance.py (1)
run(6-63)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (1)
cortex/health/monitor.py (2)
HealthCheck(22-26)CheckResult(12-20)
🪛 GitHub Check: SonarCloud Code Analysis
cortex/health/checks/disk.py
[warning] 26-26: Fix this condition that always evaluates to false.
cortex/health/checks/security.py
[warning] 58-58: Remove this redundant Exception class; it derives from another which is already caught.
[warning] 58-58: Remove this redundant Exception class; it derives from another which is already caught.
[warning] 73-73: Remove this redundant Exception class; it derives from another which is already caught.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cortex/health/checks/security.py (1)
5-45: SecurityCheckrunimplementation and public API shape look solidThe scoring, status mapping, and aggregation into
CheckResultare straightforward and consistent with the 0–100 scale, and the class/method docstrings plusrun(self) -> CheckResultsignature satisfy the public API requirements. I don’t see functional or security issues in this segment.As per coding guidelines, docstring coverage and type hints for the public API here look correct.
hyaku0121
changed the title
|
1 participant
Closes #128
Summary
I have implemented the
System Healthmodule including Security, Disk, Performance, and Update checks.Features Implemented
tests/test_health_monitor.py.Note on Advanced Requirements (Auto-fix & History)
To avoid altering the core architecture of the
HealthCheckbase class, I implemented the Automated Fixes and Trend Tracking features in a standalone utility script located atscripts/verify_ubuntu_compatibility.py.This script demonstrates:
You can run this script to verify these capabilities immediately.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes / Improvements
Tests
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.