Added name to cla signers Omkar Gaikwad (Team effiti)

[Omkar1701]

Related Issue

Closes #

Summary

AI Disclosure

• No AI used
• AI/IDE/Agents used (please describe below)

Checklist

• Tests pass (pytest tests/)
• MVP label added if closing MVP issue
• Update "Cortex -h" (if needed)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added a new contributor record to the signer list.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new contributor entry for Omkar Gaikwad to the CLA signers registry in .github/cla-signers.json. The entry includes the contributor's name, GitHub username, email address, signature date, and CLA version.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CLA Signers Registry .github/cla-signers.json	Added individual CLA signer entry: Omkar Gaikwad (github_username: Omkar1701, email: omkargaik495@gmail.com, signed_date: 2026-01-09, cla_version: 1.0)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• #403 — Adds a different individual CLA signer entry to the same .github/cla-signers.json file
• #419 — Appends a new signer object to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json
• #477 — Adds another new individual entry to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json

Suggested reviewers

• mikejmorgan-ai
• Anshgrover23

Poem

🐰✨ A new signature joins the fold,
Omkar's mark in JSON gold,
CLA registry grows so bright,
Hop along, contributor's flight! 🪤

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description is mostly unfilled template with no actual content provided for required sections like Related Issue, Summary, and AI Disclosure checkboxes.	Fill in the Related Issue number, provide a Summary of the change, indicate AI tool usage, and confirm checklist items have been reviewed.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding Omkar Gaikwad to the CLA signers list.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

• @Omkar1701 (Omkar1701, omkargaik495@gmail.com)

How to Sign

1. Read the CLA document
2. Open a CLA signature request
3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

---

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Omkar1701, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the project's Contributor License Agreement (CLA) signers list by adding a new contributor's details. This is a standard procedure to formally acknowledge individuals who have agreed to the project's contribution terms, ensuring legal clarity for their contributions.

Highlights

• New CLA Signer Added: A new entry has been added to the cla-signers.json file, recording 'Omkar Gaikwad' as a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) signer.
• Contributor Details: The new entry includes the name 'Omkar Gaikwad', GitHub username 'Omkar1701', and an email address 'omkargaik495@gmail.com'.
• Signed Date and Version: The CLA was signed on '2026-01-09' and is associated with 'cla_version': '1.0'.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a new signatory, Omkar Gaikwad, to the CLA signers list. While the data being added is correct, the change also introduces some unnecessary whitespace and blank lines. I've left a suggestion to remove them to maintain the file's formatting consistency.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

3-3: Update the last_updated field to reflect this change.

The last_updated field is currently set to "2026-01-03", but this PR adds a new signer on "2026-01-09". Update the field to maintain accurate metadata about when the file was last modified.

📅 Proposed fix

-  "last_updated": "2026-01-03",
+  "last_updated": "2026-01-09",

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

189-191: Optional: Clean up trailing whitespace.

Line 189 appears to contain trailing whitespace, and there are multiple blank lines at the end of the file. These don't affect JSON validity but could be cleaned up for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 012513c and cf50c0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/cla-signers.json

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

180-188: LGTM! CLA signer entry is properly structured.

The new entry for Omkar Gaikwad follows the correct schema, includes all required fields (name, github_username, emails, signed_date, cla_version), and the data is consistent with the PR metadata.