Skip to content

Conversation

@Kesavaraja67
Copy link
Contributor

@Kesavaraja67 Kesavaraja67 commented Dec 31, 2025

Added my signature to cla-signers.json to resolve the CLA check on PR #350.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated contributor agreement records.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A CLA (Contributor License Agreement) signers file was updated with a new contributor signature and timestamp adjustments. The file's last-updated date was incremented, one existing signer's date was modified, and a new signer entry was added with associated metadata.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CLA Signers Registry
.github/cla-signers.json
Updated last_updated timestamp to 2025-12-31; refreshed Ansh Grover's signed date to 2025-12-30; added new signer entry for Kesavaraja M (GitHub: Kesavaraja67, email: krkesavaraja67@gmail.com, CLA v1.0)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related issues

  • CLA Signature: Kesavaraja M #402: Addition of new CLA signer Kesavaraja M with matching GitHub username and email directly corresponds to this CLA signature registration issue.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Suyashd999
  • Sahilbhatane

Poem

🐰 A new friend hops into our CLA fold,
Kesavaraja's signature, shiny and bold!
Timestamps tick forward, dates now aligned,
Our contributor roster, forever refined. ✨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description explains the purpose (resolving CLA check on PR #350) but lacks required sections like Related Issue, Summary structure, and Checklist from the template. Add the required template sections including the Related Issue (Closes #350), structured Summary section, and the Checklist with appropriate items.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding a CLA signature for Kesavaraja M.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42bfd10 and c00ebdb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/cla-signers.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/cla-signers.json (2)

32-32: Clarify the modification to Ansh Grover's signed_date.

The PR objective states the change adds Kesavaraja M's signature, but line 32 modifies Ansh Grover's signed_date from 2024-12-29 to 2025-12-30. This change is not mentioned in the PR description or commit message.

Was this modification intentional, or was it an accidental change?


35-43: New contributor entry is well-formed.

The new entry for Kesavaraja M follows the established schema, with all required fields present and correctly formatted. The signed_date aligns with the updated last_updated timestamp, and the cla_version matches the file version.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

How to Sign

  1. Read the CLA document
  2. Open a CLA signature request
  3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
  4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@Kesavaraja67 Kesavaraja67 mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2025
3 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Suyashd999 LGTM!

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 merged commit 319e0f2 into cortexlinux:main Dec 31, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2025
3 tasks
pavanimanchala53 pushed a commit to pavanimanchala53/cortex that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2026
pavanimanchala53 pushed a commit to pavanimanchala53/cortex that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants